ArticleAntonie van Leeuwenhoek2024
Microbial community diversity analysis of kiwifruit pollen and identification of potential pathogens.
Article in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The kiwifruit industry typically uses commercial pollen for artificial pollination. However, during the collection of male flowers and pollen production, pollen can be easily contaminated by pathogenic bacteria that cause diseases such as canker and flower rot. Consequently, it is crucial to understand the structure of the pollen microbial community. This study employed Illumina high-throughput sequencing technology to analyze the fungal and bacterial composition in pollen samples from various regions in Shaanxi Province. Concurrently, potential pathogenic strains were isolated using traditional microbial isolation and cultivation techniques, and their molecular identification was performed through 16S rDNA sequence analysis. A tieback test was conducted on healthy branches to verify the pathogenicity of the strains. The results revealed a rich diversity of fungi and bacteria in kiwifruit pollen. At the phylum level, pollen fungi were mainly distributed in Ascomycota, and bacteria were mainly distributed in Proteobacteria and Firmicutes. The dominant fungal genera were Mycosphaerella, Aspergillus, and Cladosporium; the dominant bacterial genera were Weissella, Pantoea, Enterobacter, and Pseudomonas, respectively. Additionally, both Erwinia persicina and Pseudomonas fluorescens, isolated from pollen, exhibited high pathogenicity toward healthy kiwifruit branches. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the microbial diversity in commercial kiwifruit pollen used for mass pollination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39164415What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.