Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39164384›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

An improved intrusion detection method for IIoT using attention mechanisms, BiGRU, and Inception-CNN.

Kai Yang, JiaMing Wang, MinJing Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A drift-aware RSScientific reports · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kai YangSchool of Computer, Xijing University, Xi'an, 710123, China.
JiaMing WangSchool of Computer, Xijing University, Xi'an, 710123, China. wjm91447@gmail.com.
MinJing LiSchool of Computer, Xijing University, Xi'an, 710123, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), existing intrusion detection models face challenges in three main areas: low accuracy in detecting attack traffic, feature redundancy when dealing with high-dimensional and complex attack traffic, making it difficult to capture critical information, and a tendency to favor learning common categories while neglecting rare categories when handling imbalanced data. To tackle these challenges, this study introduces an intrusion detection method that combines an attention mechanism, Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Units (BiGRU), and Inception Convolutional Neural Network (Inception-CNN) to enhance the model's detection rate. Simultaneously, the method employs a mixed sampling strategy for data resampling to address the bias learning issue caused by data imbalance. Additionally, the method employs a hybrid sampling strategy for data resampling to address the bias learning issue caused by data imbalance. It also incorporates denoising techniques to handle potential dataset noise introduced by hybrid sampling. Furthermore, a feature selection method combining Pearson correlation coefficient and Random Forest is applied to eliminate feature redundancy, enhancing the model's ability to capture crucial information from high-dimensional attack traffic. Experimental validation on internationally recognized datasets (Edge-IIoTset, CIC-IDS2017, and CIC IoT 2023) affirms the reliability of the proposed intrusion detection method. This approach underscores the significance of intrusion detection in the security of Industrial IoT and showcases its potential in addressing pertinent challenges in network security.

Identifiers

PMID39164384
PMCPMC11335856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.