ArticleScientific reports2024
Effect of different inner pressures of air insoles and walking durations on plantar pressure time integral.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating plantar soft tissue elasticity modulation using air insoles during walking.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Trial
- Exploring air insole pressure and walking durations effects on microcirculation in healthy individuals to optimize diabetic foot ulcers prevention.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Assessing Plantar Skin Epidermal Layer in Response to Various Insole Hardness via Deep Learning Enabled Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis.Journal of biophotonics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Air insoles have provided insights for reducing the risk of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). The pressure time integral (PTI) is an effective assessment that considers the time effect in various physical activities. We investigated the interactions between three different insole inner pressures (80, 160, and 240 mmHg) and two walking durations (10 and 20 min). The big toe (T1), first metatarsal head (M1), and second metatarsal head (M2) were investigated in 13 healthy participants. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the effects of each insole inner pressure significantly differed (P < 0.05) with a 10 min walking duration. The PTI values resulting from 80 mmHg in M2 (38.4 ± 3.8, P = 0.002) and 160 mmHg in M1 (44.3 ± 4.3, P = 0.027) were lower than those from 240 mmHg. Additionally, the paired t test showed that the effects of each walking duration were also considerably different at 160 mmHg. The PTI at 10 min was lower than that at 20 min in M1 (44.31 ± 4.31, P = 0.015) and M2 (47.14 ± 5.27, P = 0.047). Thus, we suggest that walking with a pressure of 160 mmHg for 10 min has a lower risk of DFU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.