Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39164339›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2024

Optimizing oocyte yield utilizing a machine learning model for dose and trigger decisions, a multi-center, prospective study.

Chelsea Canon, Lily Leibner, Michael Fanton, Zeyu Chang, Vaishali Suraj, Joseph A Lee, Kevin Loewke, David Hoffman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07515118 (An Artificial Intelligence Based Approach for Selecting the Optimal Day for Triggering.), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07515118 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

An Artificial Intelligence Based Approach for Selecting the Optimal Day for Triggering.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundacion DexeusRan2026 to 2027Enrolled644ConditionsInfertility, Ovarian Stimulation, Artificial IntelligenceArmsSTIMAI®., Routine clinical management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Minimising OHSS in women with PCOS.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chelsea CanonRMA of New York, 635 Madison Avenue, 10th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
Lily LeibnerRMA of New York, 635 Madison Avenue, 10th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
Michael FantonAlife Health, Inc., 3717 Buchanan Street, Suite 400, San Francisco, CA, 94123, USA.
Zeyu ChangAlife Health, Inc., 3717 Buchanan Street, Suite 400, San Francisco, CA, 94123, USA.
Vaishali SurajAlife Health, Inc., 3717 Buchanan Street, Suite 400, San Francisco, CA, 94123, USA. vsuraj@alifehealth.com.
Joseph A LeeRMA of New York, 635 Madison Avenue, 10th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
Kevin LoewkeAlife Health, Inc., 3717 Buchanan Street, Suite 400, San Francisco, CA, 94123, USA.
David HoffmanIVF Florida, 3251 N State Rd 7 Suite 200, Margate, FL, 33063, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes for patients undergoing IVF treatment where an artificial intelligence (AI) platform was utilized by clinicians to help determine the optimal starting dose of FSH and timing of trigger injection. This was a prospective clinical trial with historical control arm. Four physicians from two assisted reproductive technology treatment centers in the United States participated in the study. The treatment arm included patients undergoing autologous IVF cycles between December 2022-April 2023 where the physician use AI to help select starting dose of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and trigger injection timing (N = 291). The control arm included historical patients treated where the same doctor did not use AI between September 2021 and September 2022. The main outcome measures were total FSH used and average number of mature metaphase II (MII) oocytes. There was a non-significant trend towards improved patient outcomes and a reduction in FSH with physician use of AI. Overall, the average number of MIIs in the treatment vs. control arm was 12.20 vs 11.24 (improvement = 0.96, p = 0.16). The average number of oocytes retrieved in the treatment vs. control arm was 16.01 vs 14.54 (improvement = 1.47, p = 0.08). The average total FSH in the treatment arm was 3671.95 IUs and the average in the control arm was 3846.29 IUs (difference = -174.35 IUs, p = 0.13). These results suggests that AI can safely assist in refining the starting dose of FSH while narrowing down the timing of the trigger injection during ovarian stimulation, benefiting the patient in optimizing the count of MII oocytes retrieved.

Indexed as

Fertilization in VitroFollicle Stimulating HormoneMachine LearningOocytesOvulation InductionAdultFemaleHumansOocyte RetrievalPregnancyProspective StudiesFollicle Stimulating HormoneArtificial intelligenceClinical studyEmbryo selectionMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39164339
PMCPMC11335759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.