Trial reportScientific reports2024
Optimizing oocyte yield utilizing a machine learning model for dose and trigger decisions, a multi-center, prospective study.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07515118 (An Artificial Intelligence Based Approach for Selecting the Optimal Day for Triggering.), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Artificial Intelligence Based Approach for Selecting the Optimal Day for Triggering.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Decision Support Models to Optimize Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation: A Scoping Review.Clinical and translational science · 2026Review
- From static snapshots to longitudinal trajectories: artificial intelligence in women's reproductive and ovarian health.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Balancing metabolic optimization and reproductive safety in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a Bayesian-informed framework for GLP-1 receptor agonists.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Predicting the optimal timing for triggering in controlled ovarian stimulation: mature oocytes retrieval predictor.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2025Article
- Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Ray of Hope for Infertility.ACS omega · 2025Review
- Deep learning-based prediction of individualized Real-time FSH doses in GnRH agonist long protocols.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Why the hypothesis of embryo selection in IVF/ICSI must finally be reconsidered.Human reproduction open · 2025Article
- The influence of the pharmaceutical industry on the development of gonadotrophins and ovarian stimulation protocols in assisted reproductive technologies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Minimising OHSS in women with PCOS.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes for patients undergoing IVF treatment where an artificial intelligence (AI) platform was utilized by clinicians to help determine the optimal starting dose of FSH and timing of trigger injection. This was a prospective clinical trial with historical control arm. Four physicians from two assisted reproductive technology treatment centers in the United States participated in the study. The treatment arm included patients undergoing autologous IVF cycles between December 2022-April 2023 where the physician use AI to help select starting dose of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and trigger injection timing (N = 291). The control arm included historical patients treated where the same doctor did not use AI between September 2021 and September 2022. The main outcome measures were total FSH used and average number of mature metaphase II (MII) oocytes. There was a non-significant trend towards improved patient outcomes and a reduction in FSH with physician use of AI. Overall, the average number of MIIs in the treatment vs. control arm was 12.20 vs 11.24 (improvement = 0.96, p = 0.16). The average number of oocytes retrieved in the treatment vs. control arm was 16.01 vs 14.54 (improvement = 1.47, p = 0.08). The average total FSH in the treatment arm was 3671.95 IUs and the average in the control arm was 3846.29 IUs (difference = -174.35 IUs, p = 0.13). These results suggests that AI can safely assist in refining the starting dose of FSH while narrowing down the timing of the trigger injection during ovarian stimulation, benefiting the patient in optimizing the count of MII oocytes retrieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.