Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39164297›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Machine learning based storm time modeling of ionospheric vertical total electron content over Ethiopia.

Ayanew Nigusie, Ambelu Tebabal, Firomsa Feyissa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ayanew NigusieDepartment of Physics, Oda Bultum Univesity, Chiro, Ethiopia. ayanew.nigusie@gmail.com.
Ambelu TebabalWashera Geospace and Radar Science Research Laboratory, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Firomsa FeyissaDepartment of Physics, Oda Bultum Univesity, Chiro, Ethiopia.

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research, United States FA8655-22-1-0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geomagnetic storms can cause variations in the ionization levels of the ionosphere, which is commonly studied using the total electron content (TEC). TEC is a crucial parameter to identify the possible effects of ionospheric variations on satellite communication and navigation. This paper assesses the performance of light gradient boosting machine (LGB) and deep neural network (DNN) machine learning algorithms in modeling ionospheric vertical TEC (VTEC) during geomagnetic disturbances. GPS VTEC data for years 2011-2016 from 13 dual-frequency receiver stations over Ethiopia was utilized. Input parameters for the models were derived from the factors that influence VTEC, such as time, location, geomagnetic activity, solar activity, solar wind, and the interplanetary magnetic field. The LGB model improved the predictions of the DNN model from root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and R

Indexed as

Deep neural networkGeomagnetic stormHyperband algorithmLightGBMTotal electron content

Identifiers

PMID39164297
PMCPMC11336228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.