ArticleNature communications2024
Rapid single-tier serodiagnosis of Lyme disease.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- News Fluorescence-Based Polarization Immunoassays as a Frontline Test for the Rapid Detection of Acute and Late Phase Lyme-Borreliosis Disease.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Protective efficacy of mutant strains ofInfection and immunity · 2026Article
- Article
- Deep learning-enhanced dual-mode multiplexed optical sensor for point-of-care diagnostics of cardiovascular diseases.Light, science & applications · 2026Article
- From forest floor to doctor's office: the immunological journey ofFrontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Lyme disease control 2.0: Advances and opportunities coming with Lyme disease vaccine VLA15.PLoS pathogens · 2025Article
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence Reveals Nature: Functional Parallels Between a Designed and a Natural Peptide.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Lyme-Borreliosis Disease: IgM Epitope Mapping and Evaluation of a Serological Assay Based on Immunodominant Bi-Specific Peptides.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Paper-Based Vertical Flow Assays for in Vitro Diagnostics and Environmental Monitoring.ACS sensors · 2025Review
- Machine learning in point-of-care testing: innovations, challenges, and opportunities.Nature communications · 2025Review
- Deep Learning-Enhanced Chemiluminescence Vertical Flow Assay for High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Testing.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- Germline encoded residues dominate the interaction of a human monoclonal antibody with decorin binding protein A ofFrontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Deep Learning-Enhanced Paper-Based Vertical Flow Assay for High-Sensitivity Troponin Detection Using Nanoparticle Amplification.ACS nano · 2024Article
- A Paper-Based Multiplexed Serological Test to Monitor Immunity against SARS-COV-2 Using Machine Learning.ACS nano · 2024Article
- A Refined Human Linear B Cell Epitope Map of Outer Surface Protein C (OspC) From the Lyme Disease Spirochete,Pathogens & immunity · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Point-of-care serological and direct antigen testing offers actionable insights for diagnosing challenging illnesses, empowering distributed health systems. Here, we report a POC-compatible serologic test for Lyme disease (LD), leveraging synthetic peptides specific to LD antibodies and a paper-based platform for rapid, and cost-effective diagnosis. Antigenic epitopes conserved across Borrelia burgdorferi genospecies, targeted by IgG and IgM antibodies, are selected to develop a multiplexed panel for detection of LD antibodies from patient sera. Multiple peptide epitopes, when combined synergistically with a machine learning-based diagnostic model achieve high sensitivity without sacrificing specificity. Blinded validation with 15 LD-positive and 15 negative samples shows 95.5% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Blind testing with the CDC's LD repository samples confirms the test accuracy, matching lab-based two-tier results, correctly differentiating between LD and look-alike diseases. This LD diagnostic test could potentially replace the cumbersome two-tier testing, improving diagnosis and enabling earlier treatment while facilitating immune monitoring and surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.