ArticleRMD open2024
Next-generation rheumatoid factor assay provides improved predictive power for the development of arthritis in patients at risk.
Article in RMD open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rheumatoid Factor Beyond Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Potential Marker of Cardiometabolic and Hepatic Risk.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2026Review
- Rheumatoid Factor: Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance and Therapeutic Implications in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterised by the presence of autoantibodies, among which those targeting the constant region of immunoglobulin G (IgG), called rheumatoid factors (RF). Despite this link, RFs can also be found in other disorders and the healthy population, which hampers its use as a diagnostic tool. We recently showed that a subset of RA-derived RFs target a distinct epitope on the IgG-Fc, a feature that is currently not used in the clinic.
methodsWe determined immunoglobulin M (IgM)-RF levels specific against an RA-associated epitope (using our engineered next-generation RF antigen 'T3-17') in a prospective cohort of 475 patients with seropositive (for IgM-RF or aCCP) arthralgia that were followed for 5 years or until the development of arthritis.
resultsThe presence of RFs targeting T3-17 was more strongly associated with progression to arthritis in comparison to traditional RF measurements. Within the group of patients positive for T3-17 RF the risk of arthritis development was increased as compared with wild-type RF, HR=3.2 (95% CI 2.4 to 4.3) vs HR=2.2 (95% CI 1.7 to 3.0). Predictive power of T3-17 RF was improved in combination with aCCP titres, HR=6.4 (4.7-8.7) vs HR=5.1 (3.9-6.8). This combination performed better than aCCP detection on its own.
conclusionThe detection of disease-specific RF is feasible and seems to improve the diagnostic power of RF and should be considered to be implemented in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.