Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39164024›Full record

ArticleAsian spine journal2024

Patient-specific mechanical analysis of pedicle screw insertion in simulated osteoporotic spinal bone models derived from medical images.

Norihiro Nishida, Hidenori Suzuki, Hanvey Tetsu, Yuki Morishita, Yogesh Kumaran, Fei Jiang, Masahiro Funaba, Kazuhiro Fujimoto, Yusuke Ichihara, Takashi Sakai and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian spine journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Norihiro NishidaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Hidenori SuzukiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Hanvey TetsuFaculty of Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Japan.
Yuki MorishitaFaculty of Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Japan.
Yogesh KumaranEngineering Center for Orthopaedic Research Excellence, Departments of Bioengineering and Orthopaedics, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Fei JiangFaculty of Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Japan.
Masahiro FunabaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Kazuhiro FujimotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Yusuke IchiharaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Takashi SakaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Junji OhgiFaculty of Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Japan.

Funding

TANAC Corporation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designBiomechanical study. PURPOSE: To investigate the mechanical characteristics of bone models created from medical images. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Recent advancements in three-dimensional (3D) printing technology have affected its application in surgery. However, a notable gap exists in the analyses of how patient's dimorphism and variations in vertebral body anatomy influence the maximum insertional torque (MIT) and pullout strength (POS) of pedicle screws (PS) in osteoporotic vertebral bone models derived from medical images.

methodsMale and female patients with computed tomography data were selected. Dimensions of the first thoracic (T1), fourth lumbar (L4), and fifth lumbar (L5) vertebrae were measured, and bone models consisting of the cancellous and cortical bones made from polyurethane foam were created. PS with diameters of 4.5 mm, 5.5 mm, and 6.5 mm were used. T1 PS were 25 mm long, and L4 and L5 PS were 40 mm long. The bone models were secured with cement, and the MIT was measured using a calibrated torque wrench. After MIT testing, the PS head was attached to the machine's crosshead. POS was then calculated at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min until failure.

resultsThe L4 and L5 were notably larger in female bone models, whereas the T1 vertebra was larger in male bone models. Consequently, the MIT and POS for L4 and L5 were higher in female bone models across all PS diameters than in male bone models. Conversely, the MIT for T1 was higher in male bone models across all PS; however, no significant differences were observed in the POS values for T1 between sexes.

conclusionsThe mechanical properties of the proposed bone models can vary based on the vertebral structure and size. For accurate 3D surgical and mechanical simulations in the creation of custom-made medical devices, bone models must be constructed from patientspecific medical images.

Indexed as

Mechanical testsPedicle screwPrintingSpineThree-dimensionalTorque

Identifiers

PMID39164024
PMCPMC11538827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.