ReviewJournal of advanced research2025
CRISPR/Cas genome editing in soybean: challenges and new insights to overcome existing bottlenecks.
Review in Journal of advanced research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome Editing Approaches in Flax (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- AI-Guided DNA-Free and Genotype-Independent Genome Editing for Soybean Improvement.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Sustainable tea plantations: Harnessing chemical-microbial synergy and smart application triangulation for targeted weed control.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- GmRPS5 Promoter-Driven CRISPR/LbCas12a Efficiently Generates Soybean Sextuple Mutants.Plant biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Developmental regulators enable rapid and efficient soybean transformation and CRISPR-mediated genome editing.Plant physiology · 2026Article
- Enhancing heritable genome editing in soybean by optimizing promoter combinations for the LbCas12a system.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Challenges and Opportunities with CRISPR-Based Genome Editing in Legume Crops.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Breakthroughs in soybean transformation.Plant physiology · 2026Article
- Advances in gene editing for legume improvement: technologies, progress, and prospects.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Review
- Calcium signaling in soybean-virus interactions: emerging roles of calcium sensors in antiviral and environmental stress responses.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- CRISPR/Cas9 in soybean research: a measured leap toward genetic refinement.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Review
- Chemical defense mechanisms of soybean genotypes against lepidopterans.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- CRISPR-Based genome editing in pulses: current approaches, challenges, and future prospects.Plant molecular biology · 2025Review
- Improved rapid and efficient hairy root transformation usingPlant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
- Revolution and advances in gene editing and genomics technology for developing climate-resilient legume crops: developments and prospects.Plant molecular biology · 2025Review
- Establishing a CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing framework in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) by targeting phytoene desaturase (PDS) gene disruption.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Genome editing, an opportunity to revive soybean cultivation in Europe.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- Advances in Soybean Genetic Improvement.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSoybean is a worldwide-cultivated crop due to its applications in the food, feed, and biodiesel industries. Genome editing in soybean began with ZFN and TALEN technologies; however, CRISPR/Cas has emerged and shortly became the preferable approach for soybean genome manipulation since it is more precise, easy to handle, and cost-effective. Recent reports have focused on the conventional Cas9 nuclease, Cas9 nickase (nCas9) derived base editors, and Cas12a (formally Cpf1) as the most commonly used genome editors in soybean. Nonetheless, several challenges in the complex plant genetic engineering pipeline need to be overcome to effectively edit the genome of an elite soybean cultivar. These challenges include (1) optimizing CRISPR cassette design (i.e., gRNA and Cas promoters, gRNA design and testing, number of gRNAs, and binary vector), (2) improving transformation frequency, (3) increasing the editing efficiency ratio of targeted plant cells, and (4) improving soybean crop production. AIM OF REVIEW: This review provides an overview of soybean genome editing using CRISPR/Cas technology, discusses current challenges, and highlights theoretical (insights) and practical suggestions to overcome the existing bottlenecks. KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW: The CRISPR/Cas system was discovered as part of the bacterial innate immune system. It has been used as a biotechnological tool for genome editing and efficiently applied in soybean to unveil gene function, improve agronomic traits such as yield and nutritional grain quality, and enhance biotic and abiotic stress tolerance. To date, the efficiency of gRNAs has been validated using protoplasts and hairy root assays, while stable plant transformation relies on Agrobacterium-mediated and particle bombardment methods. Nevertheless, most steps of the CRISPR/Cas workflow require optimizations to achieve a more effective genome editing in soybean plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.