ArticleComplementary medicine research2024
Regional Perspectives on Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Results of a Regional Survey.
Article in Complementary medicine research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComplementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is widely used by patients with cancer. Research indicates that the use of CAM is more prevalent in rural areas compared to urban areas. There is currently a lack of information regarding the scope and specifics of CAM use among patients in Sweden, particularly in rural areas. The aim of this study was to estimate the extent and characteristics of CAM use among cancer patients in the rural areas of Region Gävleborg.
methodsA total of 631 questionnaires were sent out, and 376 of those were returned, corresponding to a response rate of 59.6%. Oncology patients received questionnaires at their initial appointment for curative care at Gävle Hospital's Department of Oncology. When enrolling in palliative outpatient care in their homes, palliative patients were sought out. Standard descriptive statistics were used to present the characteristics of the respondents. To determine odds ratios and potential factors (age, gender, diagnosis, and education) affecting CAM use after cancer diagnosis, a multivariable logistic model was constructed.
resultsBased on clinical observations, the authors' hypothesis that CAM use is particularly common in small towns in the Hälsingland region was verified in this study. This was particularly pronounced among younger people and residents of small towns in the province of Halsingland. The higher level of CAM use appears to apply to both men and women.
conclusionsCAM appears to be used more frequently by patients residing in rural areas. It is crucial that care providers enquire about all of the patient's health-seeking activities. Further research is needed on the usage of CAM in rural areas and the potential cultural influences contributing to CAM use. From a sociological standpoint, it is crucial to draw attention to the fact that CAM use may be more prevalent in certain rural areas, particularly in centralized societies where it is more difficult to access healthcare in remote regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.