ArticlePloS one2024
Comparative analysis of national and foreign players' performance in Euroleague Basketball.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of foreign players' participation in the Palestinian basketball league on team cohesion from the perspective of local players.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- A deep learning-based study of player styles and cross-league performance adaptation mechanisms: a case study of the NBA and CBA.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to quantitatively assess the statistical contributions between foreign and national players in men's Euroleague Basketball. Data from 588 games in the 2021-2022 regular season and 612 games in the 2022-2023 regular season were analyzed through non-participant observation. Paired t-tests and Wilcoxon tests were employed to analyse variables with normal and non-normal distributions, respectively. The analysis indicated significant differences (p<0.05) between local and foreign players across several key variables, including Minutes, Points, Average Points, Usage Percentage, Individual Offensive Rating, Individual Defensive Rating, and True Shooting Percentage. These findings suggest pronounced distinctions between foreign players and national players concerning game volume indicators and game performance efficiency. Foreign players exhibited dominance in critical areas, such as playing time, total points scored, and average points per game, underscoring their substantial contributions to their respective teams. Consequently, these results offer practical implications for players, coaches, and fitness trainers, allowing for the design of more tailored training programs that account for distinct offensive and defensive needs, as well as the heightened physical demands experienced throughout the season.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.