Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39163361›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Recognition of the game situation in baseball.

Yasuhiro Hashimoto, Hiroshi Takahashi, Hiromu Nagaura, Shinji Yoshitake, Hiroki Nakata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yasuhiro HashimotoDepartment of Medical Data Intelligence, Research Center for Health-Medical Data Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0829-2506
Hiroshi TakahashiDepartment of Health, Sport and Communication, Kobe University of Future Health Sciences, Fukusaki Town, Hyogo, Japan.
Hiromu NagauraAdvanced Teacher Professional Development Program, Hokkaido University of Education, Asahikawa City, Japan.
Shinji YoshitakeFaculty of Sustainable System Sciences, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka City, Japan.
Hiroki NakataFaculty of Engineering, Nara Women's University, Nara City, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8549-6468

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines baseball players' recognition framework of out, ball, and strike counts in baseball games and clarifies the differences in psychological perspectives between batters and pitchers. The participants were 396 players (294 batters and 102 pitchers) belonging to baseball clubs at eight universities. Participants answered 288 questions for all game situations by combining out, ball, and strike counts and runner position. The advantages for batters or pitchers were evaluated using a 7-point Likert scale (from very advantageous for batters to very advantageous for pitchers). Factor analysis indicated four significant factors (36 items): "Batter's advantage count," "Pitcher's advantage count," "2 out young count," and "0 out young count." In a direct comparison of these factors between batters and pitchers, batters were more aware of their advantage over pitchers in the factors "Batter's advantage count" and "0 out young count" and disadvantage in the "Pitcher's advantage count." Significant differences in recognition of these factors were observed between batters and pitchers. Batters were more susceptible to game situations than were pitchers. Our findings suggest that baseball players recognize several types of game situations, although not an infinite number.

Indexed as

BaseballAdultAthletic PerformanceHumansMaleRecognition, PsychologyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39163361
PMCPMC11335100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.