Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39163108›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2024

Guidelines to support the design, and selection and appraisal of multimedia teaching aids for microbiology education.

R Van Beek, D J C Spijkerman, N van der Burgt, B Hermanns, S Barendse, P D Sainsbury, K N Timmis, J K Timmis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

R Van BeekAthena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
D J C SpijkermanAthena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
N van der BurgtAthena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
B HermannsAthena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S BarendseAthena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P D SainsburyApplied Microbiology International, Cambridge, UK.
K N TimmisDivision of Microbiology, Technical University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0066-4670
J K TimmisAthena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7773-0859

Funding

Society for Applied Microbiology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiology education has a serious handicap - the lack of visibility of the players of the subject and their interactions - which engenders a disproportionate reliance upon multimedia teaching aids (MTAs). The International Microbiology Literacy Initiative (IMiLI) is creating educational resources in societally-relevant microbiology complemented by appropriate MTAs. However, proper guidance supporting microbiology educators in locating and selecting, or commissioning the creation of, adequate MTAs for different target audiences and learning objectives is lacking. The aims of this study were to (i) identify important considerations regarding educational/didactical standards and the design of educational multimedia and (ii) create an evidence-based guideline for selecting and appraising existing, and informing the creation of new, microbiology MTAs. This investigation is based on an exploratory, mixed-methods approach. The results of two literature reviews (covering educational and good practice multimedia design) informed the collation of a preliminary appraisal guideline for videos, animations, comics, and video games. A web-scraping approach was utilised to locate and retrieve existing exemplars of the four multimedia types and create four pertinent multimedia databases (including metadata). The preliminary guideline was piloted (and revised accordingly) by appraising quasi-random (or purposive) samples of each multimedia type. Educational multimedia experts were interviewed to discuss the findings. Finally, the guideline was updated to reflect the expert comments together with the results of the pilot appraisals. The final guideline has four components: (i) central considerations for selecting and appraising multimedia for specific audiences and educational purposes, (ii) multimedia selection tool, (iii) multimedia appraisal tools, and (iv) extensive background information as appendices linking all sections for further comprehension. Broad utilisation of the guideline has significant potential for simplifying and systematising multimedia selection/creation, leading to superior multimedia-based learning outcomes, establishing a rapid selection database (pre-appraised multimedia), reducing disparities in microbiology education and incentivising educational content creators.

Indexed as

MicrobiologyMultimediaGuidelines as TopicHumansTeachingTeaching Materials

Identifiers

PMID39163108
PMCPMC11334907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.