Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39163096›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

The Use of Deep Learning and Machine Learning on Longitudinal Electronic Health Records for the Early Detection and Prevention of Diseases: Scoping Review.

Laura Swinckels, Frank C Bennis, Kirsten A Ziesemer, Janneke F M Scheerman, Harmen Bijwaard, Ander de Keijzer, Josef Jan Bruers

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. From Integrated Care to Learning Systems.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Early detection of adults ADHD using electronic health records: A machine learning study.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Article
  15. Evaluation of trajectory analysis for disease risk assessment: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura SwinckelsDepartment of Oral Public Health, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4096-5491
Frank C BennisQuantitative Data Analytics Group, Department of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6233-9101
Kirsten A ZiesemerMedical Library, University Library, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7783-1126
Janneke F M ScheermanDepartment Oral Hygiene, Cluster Health, Sports and Welfare, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8516-0112
Harmen BijwaardMedical Technology Research Group, Cluster Health, Sport and Welfare, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Haarlem, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1314-5260
Ander de KeijzerData Driven Smart Society Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, Design & Computing, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Alkmaar, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4790-3082
Josef Jan BruersDepartment of Oral Public Health, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3755-2947

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic health records (EHRs) contain patients' health information over time, including possible early indicators of disease. However, the increasing amount of data hinders clinicians from using them. There is accumulating evidence suggesting that machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) can assist clinicians in analyzing these large-scale EHRs, as algorithms thrive on high volumes of data. Although ML has become well developed, studies mainly focus on engineering but lack medical outcomes.

objectiveThis study aims for a scoping review of the evidence on how the use of ML on longitudinal EHRs can support the early detection and prevention of disease. The medical insights and clinical benefits that have been generated were investigated by reviewing applications in a variety of diseases.

methodsThis study was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A literature search was performed in 2022 in collaboration with a medical information specialist in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate Analytics), and IEEE Xplore Digital Library and computer science bibliography. Studies were eligible when longitudinal EHRs were used that aimed for the early detection of disease via ML in a prevention context. Studies with a technical focus or using imaging or hospital admission data were beyond the scope of this review. Study screening and selection and data extraction were performed independently by 2 researchers.

resultsIn total, 20 studies were included, mainly published between 2018 and 2022. They showed that a variety of diseases could be detected or predicted, particularly diabetes; kidney diseases; diseases of the circulatory system; and mental, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental disorders. Demographics, symptoms, procedures, laboratory test results, diagnoses, medications, and BMI were frequently used EHR data in basic recurrent neural network or long short-term memory techniques. By developing and comparing ML and DL models, medical insights such as a high diagnostic performance, an earlier detection, the most important predictors, and additional health indicators were obtained. A clinical benefit that has been evaluated positively was preliminary screening. If these models are applied in practice, patients might also benefit from personalized health care and prevention, with practical benefits such as workload reduction and policy insights.

conclusionsLongitudinal EHRs proved to be helpful for support in health care. Current ML models on EHRs can support the detection of diseases in terms of accuracy and offer preliminary screening benefits. Regarding the prevention of diseases, ML and specifically DL models can accurately predict or detect diseases earlier than current clinical diagnoses. Adding personally responsible factors allows targeted prevention interventions. While ML models based on textual EHRs are still in the developmental stage, they have high potential to support clinicians and the health care system and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEarly DiagnosisElectronic Health RecordsMachine LearningHumansLongitudinal Studiesartificial intelligencebig datadetectionelectronic health recordsmachine learningpersonalized health carepredictionprevention

Identifiers

PMID39163096
PMCPMC11372333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.