Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39163030›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2024

Searching for the earliest archaeological record: insights from chimpanzee material landscapes.

Jonathan S Reeves, Tomos Proffitt, Soiret Serge Pacome, Lydia V Luncz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan S ReevesTechnological Primates Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6 , Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2017-0539
Tomos ProffittTechnological Primates Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6 , Leipzig, Germany.
Soiret Serge PacomeLaboratoire de Zoologie et de Biologie Animale, Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny , Abidjan, 22 BP 582 Abidjan 22, Côte d'Ivoire, West Africa.
Lydia V LunczTechnological Primates Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6 , Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2972-4742

Funding

Max Planck Society
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The origin of tool use is a central question in human evolutionary studies. Plio-Pleistocene core and flake technologies represent the earliest evidence of tool use in the human lineage. Some suggest this form of tool use is probably pre-dated by a phase of percussive tool use. However, there is currently no evidence for such a record. The archaeological signature of solely percussive behaviours is not as well understood as that associated with cores and flakes. The durable nature of primate percussive stone tools and their by-products provide an opportunity to investigate what such a record looks like. Here, we present a landscape-scale study of the chimpanzee (

Indexed as

ArchaeologyPan troglodytesTool Use BehaviorAnimalsCote d'IvoireHumanschimpanzeeslandscape archaeologynut crackingprimate archaeologystone tools

Identifiers

PMID39163030
PMCPMC11335018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.