Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39162943›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2025

Ethical Challenges in Information Disclosure and Decision-making in Prenatal Testing: A Focus Group Study of Chinese Health Professionals in Maternal and Child Health Services.

Yuqiong Zhong, Tianchi Hao, Xing Liu, Xin Zhang, Ying Wu, Xiaomin Wang, Dan Luo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuqiong ZhongSchool of Humanities, Central South University, Lushan South Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410012, People's Republic of China.
Tianchi HaoSchool of Humanities, Central South University, Lushan South Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410012, People's Republic of China.
Xing LiuOffice of International Cooperation and Exchanges, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008, People's Republic of China.
Xin ZhangMedical Humanities Research Center, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008, People's Republic of China.
Ying WuSchool of Humanities, Central South University, Lushan South Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410012, People's Republic of China.
Xiaomin WangCenter for Clinical Pharmacology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 138 Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410013, People's Republic of China.
Dan LuoDepartment of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, 172 Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410013, People's Republic of China. luodan_csu_2011@126.com.

Funding

Changsha Science and Technology Project kh2302018China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2023M733977Major Scientific and Technological Projects for collaborative prevention and control of birth defects in Hunan Province 2019SK1010National Social Science Fund of China, Research on Moral Issues in the Field of Contemporary Science and Technology 22&ZD044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The international community has proposed a comprehensive strategy to prevent congenital abnormalities. And China, with a high incidence of congenital diseases, has implemented measures including prenatal screening and diagnosis to reduce the morbidity of congenital abnormalities. However, ethical challenges arise in the practice of prenatal screening and diagnosis among healthcare professionals. Five focus group discussions were conducted with twenty-four health professionals working in maternal and child health services in Hunan Province, China, to explore the ethical challenges they encountered in prenatal testing decision-making and information disclosure practices, as well as their views on these challenges. Participants were selected through purposive sampling, ensuring maximum demographic diversity. Three main themes were identified: 1) balancing between information disclosure and privacy protection; 2) patient-oriented decision-making and tensions within family-oriented decision-making; 3) the disparity between the limited help clinical ethics committees (CECs) can provide and professionals' need for CECs. Ethical norms for information disclosure and autonomous decision-making within prenatal screening and diagnostic institutions must be established. Utilizing CECs is crucial to guide professionals in delivering prenatal testing services while simultaneously focusing on targeted improvement of communication skills among these professionals.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDisclosureHealth PersonnelMaternal-Child Health ServicesPrenatal DiagnosisAdultChinaConfidentialityCongenital AbnormalitiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePregnancyDecision-makingEthicsHealth professionalsInformation disclosureMaternal and child healthPrenatal testing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.