ArticleUpdates in surgery2024
Automatic wound closure system: closure of large wounds by stretching the skin around the wound.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biomechanical mechanism and clinical management progress of surgical wound tension.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large-wound treatment often requires autologous skin grafting or skin flap transfer, causing iatrogenic secondary injuries. Thus, we have developed an automatic wound closure system that consists of a stretch module, microcontroller, and touch screen. Full-thickness wounds (8 × 14 cm) on Bama miniature pigs were manually closed by direct suture in control animals and with three different tension levels performed by the automatic device in the experimental animals. Wound-closure conditions, post-closure healing, and scars were evaluated. Post-operative microscopic changes in collagen fibers, local cell apoptosis, and changes in vascular density were compared between the two wound-closure techniques. In the control group and the first experimental group, which used a traction force of 15 N, primary wound closure could not be achieved. The other two experimental groups used a traction force of 30 N and 60 N and all wounds achieved primary closure. Collagen-fiber stretching was observed histologically in all groups and collagen-fiber breakdown occurred in some wounds when the traction force was 60 N. Scar hyperplasia was significantly reduced in the automatic wound closure system groups. The collagen content decreased, cell apoptosis increased, and vascular density decreased in local tissues in the early post-closure stage, but eventually recovered to normal-skin levels. In summary, we developed an automatic wound closure system that effectively and safely stretches dermal-collagen fibers under an appropriate traction force (30 N) and stretch wound-peripheral skin to cover the wound, achieve primary closure, and reduce scar hyperplasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39162930What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.