Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39162874›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2024

Is add-on Bevacizumab therapy to Temozolomide and radiotherapy associated with clinical utility for newly diagnosed Glioblastoma? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mohammad Amin Habibi, Niloufar Shad, Mohammad Sina Mirjnani, Sara Fasihi, Sara Sadeghi, Shaghayegh Karami, Muhammad Hussain Ahmadvand, Pouria Delbari, Amir Hossein Zare, Amir Hessam Zare and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mohammad Amin HabibiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Mohammad.habibi1392@yahoo.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7600-6925
Niloufar ShadSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7407-1965
Mohammad Sina MirjnaniStudent Research Committee, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7553-1016
Sara FasihiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9886-446X
Sara SadeghiSchool of Medicine, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0138-1872
Shaghayegh KaramiSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6372-4994
Muhammad Hussain AhmadvandSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Pouria DelbariSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6964-8101
Amir Hossein ZareSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1654-6741
Amir Hessam ZareSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Ahmad Naseri AlaviDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. dr.arsalan2010@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bevacizumab, temozolomide (TMZ), and radiotherapy are three therapeutic methods, but the combination of them as a new approach for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas (HGGs) is still under investigation. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical utility of this treatment approach for patients with glioblastoma (GBM). PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically reviewed from inception to 24 August 2023. Relevant studies evaluating the therapeutic effect of adding Bevacizumab to TMZ-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy were enrolled. All statistical analysis was performed using the "meta" package of R. A total of 21 studies were included in this study. Our meta-analysis found that adding bevacizumab to standard therapy improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. The pooled 6-month PFS rate was significantly higher with bevacizumab (79% vs. 56%, odds ratio 3.17). Overall survival (OS) showed modest improvements, with 2-year OS rates of 39% vs. 20% favoring bevacizumab. Radiological response rates varied, with a pooled overall response rate of 44% for bevacizumab-treated patients. The complete response rate was 16%, partial response 32%, and progressive disease 25%. Adverse events occurred in 62% of bevacizumab-treated patients. Common complications included fatigue, thrombocytopenia, and thromboembolic events. When added to standard therapy, bevacizumab demonstrates modest improvements in PFS and OS for newly diagnosedGBM. While it shows promise in short-term outcomes and radiological responses, long-term survival benefits remain limited. The risk of adverse events, particularly CNS hemorrhage, necessitates careful patient selection. These findings suggest that bevacizumab may have a role in treating high-grade gliomas, but its use should be individualized based on patient characteristics and risk-benefit assessment.

Indexed as

BevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaTemozolomideAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingChemoradiotherapyHumansProgression-Free SurvivalAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBevacizumabTemozolomideBevacizumabGliomaHigh-grade gliomaNewly diagnosedRadiotherapyTemozolomide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.