ArticleSurgery today2025
Enhanced safety in central venous catheterization performed by Japanese board-certified pediatric surgeons: a retrospective single-center study.
Article in Surgery today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced safety in central venous catheterization performed by Japanese board-certified pediatric surgeons: a retrospective single-center study.Surgery today · 2025Article
- Factors prolonging the operative time for transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in pediatric patients: a retrospective single-center study.Surgery today · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBoard certification by the Japanese Society of Pediatric Surgeons is awarded to pediatric surgeons with substantial surgical experience and academic achievement. However, to date, the surgical performance or outcomes of certified surgeons have not been reported. This study examined the relationship between board certification and surgical outcomes of central venous catheterization.
methodsThis retrospective single-center study was conducted between April 2017 and May 2024. Patients were classified based on whether their procedures were performed by board-certified or non-certified surgeons, and their backgrounds and surgical outcomes were compared. In addition, multivariate analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with prolonged operative time.
resultsThis study included 112 procedures: 26 performed by board-certified surgeons and 86 performed by non-certified surgeons. There were no significant differences in the age, sex, weight, or primary diagnosis between the groups; however, surgery-associated complications were significantly more common in the non-certified surgeon group than in the board-certified surgeon group (15.1% vs. 0%, P = 0.036). In addition, factors independently associated with a prolonged operative time included weight < 10 kg, left-sided approach, implantable port device use, and < 7 years of postgraduate experience for the surgeon.
conclusionBoard certification was associated with a significant reduction in surgery-associated complications during central venous catheterization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39162864What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.