ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2025
Exploring Perceptions of Anti-vaping Message Themes: A Qualitative Study of Australian Adolescents and Adults.
Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMinimizing electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) uptake and encouraging vaping cessation have become important components of public health agendas. Given the success of well-designed anti-smoking campaigns, attention has turned to developing health communications that target vaping. Although prior work has identified a range of potentially effective campaign messages, several gaps in the literature remain. We aimed to (1) identify message themes perceived to be effective at minimizing e-cigarette use and (2) elicit opinions on how these message themes could be optimized in terms of message execution and delivery. AIMS AND
methodsFocus groups (FG; n = 16) were conducted with adolescents (14- to 15- and 16- to 17-year-olds), young adults (18- to 24-year-olds), and adults (25- to 39-year-olds). The groups reported on message themes they believed would assist with minimizing e-cigarette use. They then provided feedback on 14 message themes developed by the research team. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsGroups discussed a range of message themes they believed would be effective. These included themes focused on the health harms associated with vaping, the chemical ingredients in e-cigarettes, use dependence, and social attitudes to use. Groups discussed the importance of using evidence-based personal testimonies and reported that messages would be most effectively communicated via social media, in public places, and at point of sale.
conclusionsResults build on existing research by identifying message themes perceived to be most effective, and how these could best be executed. Results have the potential to inform the development of co-designed health communication campaigns addressing youth vaping. IMPLICATIONS: Using a stratified FG methodology, we collected rich and detailed qualitative data on Australians' perceptions of anti-vaping message themes. The themes considered most effective were those that addressed the health harms of vaping, the chemical ingredients in e-cigarettes, the social consequences of use, and the impacts of dependence. We recommend further work to develop and trial a range of specific anti-vaping messages based on the themes identified as having the most potential. This process should include iterative co-design with the target audience to optimize future health communication campaigns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.