Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39162743›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of urology2024

Differential effect of surgical technique on intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.

Ichiro Tsuboi, Akihiro Matsukawa, Mehdi Kardoust Parizi, Jakob Klemm, Robert J Schulz, Anna Cadenar, Stefano Mancon, Sever Chiujdea, Tamás Fazekas, Marcin Miszczyk and 12 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Ichiro TsuboiDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3135-8262
Akihiro MatsukawaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
Mehdi Kardoust PariziDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
Jakob KlemmDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
Robert J SchulzDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
Anna CadenarDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
Stefano ManconDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
Sever ChiujdeaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
Tamás FazekasDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
Marcin MiszczykDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
Ekaterina LaukhtinaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
Tatsushi KawadaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
Satoshi KatayamaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
Takehiro IwataDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
Kensuke BekkuDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
Koichiro WadaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
Paolo GonteroDivision of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Morgan RouprêtSorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Urology, PARIS, F- 75013, France.
Jeremy TeohDepartment of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Nirmish SinglaDepartment of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Park 213, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Motoo ArakiDepartment of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextRadical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff resection is the standard treatment in patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). However, it is unclear which specific surgical technique may lead to improve oncological outcomes in term of intravesical recurrence (IVR) in patients with UTUC.

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of surgical techniques and approaches of RNU in reducing IVR in UTUC patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Three databases were queried in January 2024 for studies analyzing UTUC patients who underwent RNU. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of IVR among various types of surgical techniques and approaches of RNU. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Thirty-one studies, comprising 1 randomized controlled trial and 1 prospective study, were included for a systematic review and meta-analysis. The rate of IVR was significantly lower in RNU patients who had an early ligation (EL) of the ureter compared to those who did not (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44-0.94, p = 0.02). Laparoscopic RNU significantly increased the IVR compared to open RNU (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.06-1.54, p < 0.001). Intravesical bladder cuff removal significantly reduced the IVR compared to both extravesical and transurethral bladder cuff removal (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.51-0.83, p = 0.02 and HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.15-2.34, p = 0.006, respectively).

conclusionsEL of the affected upper tract system, ureteral management, open RNU, and intravesical bladder cuff removal seem to yield the lowest IVR rate in patients with UTUC. Well-designed prospective studies are needed to conclusively elucidate the optimal surgical technique in the setting of single post-operative intravesical chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellNephroureterectomyUreteral NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsHumansKidney NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalUreterIntravesical recurrenceRadical nephroureterectomyUpper tract urinary cancer

Identifiers

PMID39162743
PMCPMC11335797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.