ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2024
Clinical and radiological outcome of surgical hallux valgus correction: open versus minimally invasive.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outcomes and Complications for Minimally Invasive Distal Transverse Metatarsal Osteotomy-Akin Osteotomy (MITA) for Hallux Valgus: 493 Cases.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHallux valgus (HV) is the most common forefoot deformity. Surgical correction of HV aims to reduce pain, preserve joints, and re-establish foot function while restoring the hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA). Many surgical procedures have been proposed, including open and minimally invasive (MI) techniques. This study aimed to compare the midterm outcomes of open vs. MI procedures and their impact on the duration of surgery, hospital stay, HVA, and IMA post-operatively. MATERIALS AND
methodsOne hundred and twenty HV patients operated by open or MI surgery between October 2019 and October 2022 were included. One hundred three patients met the inclusion criteria and consented to the study. Patients were prospectively surveyed for foot functionality, post-operative pain, and complications using the AOFAS score. Radiographic measurements of HV angles, length of hospital stay, and surgery duration were analysed.
resultsMI surgery patients had significantly better AOFAS scores (p < 0.001) 12 months post-operatively compared to open surgery. Complication rates were lower in the MI group (3.8% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.001). MI surgery patients also had shorter hospital stays (0.9 ± 0.3 days vs. 2.0 ± 0.0 days) and surgery duration (19.7 ± 2.3 min vs. 80.7 ± 6.8 min). MI surgery was more effective in correcting the IMA but equally effective as open surgery for HVA correction.
conclusionMI surgery resulted in better patient satisfaction, fewer complications, and more precise correction of IMA values. Moreover, the duration of surgery and hospital stay were significantly lower in patients undergoing MI surgery. Further research is needed to validate these findings in controlled, prospective randomised trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.