ArticlemBio2024
Interpolation of microbiome composition in longitudinal data sets.
Article in mBio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sparse time-varying log-ratios for longitudinal high-throughput sequencing data.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Design, processing, and modeling for longitudinal multiomics microbiome data.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Distinguishing critical microbial community shifts from normal temporal variability in human and environmental ecosystems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The human gut microbiome significantly impacts health, prompting a rise in longitudinal studies that capture microbiome samples at multiple time points. Such studies allow researchers to characterize microbiome changes over time, but importantly, also present major analytical challenges due to incomplete or irregular sampling. To address this challenge, longitudinal microbiome studies often employ various interpolation methods, aiming to infer missing microbiome data. However, to date, a comprehensive assessment of such microbiome interpolation techniques, as well as best practice guidelines for interpolating microbiome data, is still lacking. This work aims to fill this gap, rigorously implementing and systematically evaluating a large array of interpolation methods, spanning several different categories, for longitudinal microbiome interpolation. To assess each method and its ability to accurately infer microbiome composition at missing time points, we used three longitudinal microbiome data sets that follow individuals over a long period of time and a leave-one-out approach. Overall, our analysis demonstrated that the K-nearest neighbors algorithm consistently outperforms other methods in interpolation accuracy, yet, accuracy varied widely across data sets, individuals, and time. Factors such as microbiome stability, sample size, and the time gap between interpolated and adjacent samples significantly influenced accuracy, allowing us to develop a model for predicting the expected interpolation accuracy at a missing time point. Our findings, combined, suggest that accurate interpolation in longitudinal microbiome data is feasible, especially in dense cohorts. Furthermore, using our predictive model, future studies can interpolate data only in time points where the expected interpolation accuracy is high. IMPORTANCE: Since missing samples are common in longitudinal microbiome dataset due to inconsistent collection practices, it is important to evaluate and benchmark different interpolation methods for predicting microbiome composition in such samples and facilitate downstream analysis. Our study rigorously evaluated several such methods and identified the K-nearest neighbors approach as particularly effective for this task. The study also notes significant variability in interpolation accuracy among individuals, influenced by factors such as age, sample size, and sampling frequency. Furthermore, we developed a predictive model for estimating interpolation accuracy at a specific time point, enhancing the reliability of such analyses in future studies. Combined, our study, thus, provides critical insights and tools that enhance the accuracy and reliability of data interpolation methods in the growing field of longitudinal microbiome research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.