ArticleSICOT-J2024
Fractures of the proximal femur and hip osteoarthrosis - coincidence or coherence?
Article in SICOT-J, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors affecting the anatomical localization of proximal femoral fractures in geriatric patients.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Impact of femoral head size on the localization of proximal femur fractures: Retrospective analysis of 400 cases.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: an update.SICOT-J · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe current study aimed to investigate the correlation between the grade of radiographic hip osteoarthritis (OA) and the fracture pattern observed in fragility fractures of the proximal femur. The information may help in cases of occult hip fractures.
methodsIn this retrospective study all 448 patients treated with fragility fractures of the proximal femur in the years 2014-2018 were included. Patients were allocated into two groups: Group I) intracapsular (femoral neck) fractures and Group II) extracapsular (pertrochanteric and subtrochanteric) femoral fractures. The radiographic grade of OA was determined according to Kellgren and Lawrence's classification. One single observer examined all radiographs.
resultsPatients' age ranged between 52 and 104 years with a mean of 80.0 years. There was a significant difference in mean age between the two groups (76.9 years intracapsular vs. 83.1 years extracapsular fractures). A total of 250 (55.8%) fractures were intracapsular (femoral neck) and 198 (44.2%) were located extracapsular (pertrochanteric, subtrochanteric). A significant correlation between the degree of OA to fracture pattern was observed: Higher degrees of OA were related to extracapsular fractures and lower degrees of OA to intracapsular fractures.
conclusionThe results of this study support the hypothesis that hip osteoarthritis affects the fracture pattern in proximal femur fractures. More severe hip OA is associated with extracapsular fractures that can be treated surgically with lower complication rates compared to intracapsular fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.