Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39162374›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Neural population dynamics underlying evidence accumulation in multiple rat brain regions.

Brian DePasquale, Carlos D Brody, Jonathan W Pillow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Brain-wide coordination of internal signals during decision-making.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Efficient numerosity estimation under limited time.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brian DePasqualePrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3830-3184
Carlos D Brody *Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4201-561X
Jonathan W Pillow *Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3638-8831

Funding

Subcortical Neural Coding and DynamicsU19NS104648 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI SEUNG, HYUNJUNE SEBASTIAN · 2017 to 2021
$15.3M
Real-time statistical algorithms for controlling neural dynamics and behaviorR01EB026946 · NIBIB · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI PARK, IL MEMMING, PILLOW, JONATHAN WILLIAM · 2018 to 2020
$1.1M
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging & Bioengineering 9RF1DA065404 - 04NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026946NINDS NIH HHS BRAIN Initiative Award 5U19NS104648-02NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS104648Simons Foundation SCGB AWD542593Simons Foundation SCGB AWD543027Simons Foundation SCGB AWD543027 and AWD542593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accumulating evidence to make decisions is a core cognitive function. Previous studies have tended to estimate accumulation using either neural or behavioral data alone. Here, we develop a unified framework for modeling stimulus-driven behavior and multi-neuron activity simultaneously. We applied our method to choices and neural recordings from three rat brain regions-the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), the frontal orienting fields (FOF), and the anterior-dorsal striatum (ADS)-while subjects performed a pulse-based accumulation task. Each region was best described by a distinct accumulation model, which all differed from the model that best described the animal's choices. FOF activity was consistent with an accumulator where early evidence was favored while the ADS reflected near perfect accumulation. Neural responses within an accumulation framework unveiled a distinct association between each brain region and choice. Choices were better predicted from all regions using a comprehensive, accumulation-based framework and different brain regions were found to differentially reflect choice-related accumulation signals: FOF and ADS both reflected choice but ADS showed more instances of decision vacillation. Previous studies relating neural data to behaviorally inferred accumulation dynamics have implicitly assumed that individual brain regions reflect the whole-animal level accumulator. Our results suggest that different brain regions represent accumulated evidence in dramatically different ways and that accumulation at the whole-animal level may be constructed from a variety of neural-level accumulators.

Indexed as

BrainDecision MakingNeuronsAnimalsChoice BehaviorMaleModels, NeurologicalParietal LobeRatscomputational biologydecision-makingevidence accumulationlatent variable modelsneuroscienceratsystems biology

Identifiers

PMID39162374
PMCPMC12005723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.