Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39162290›Full record

ArticleNano letters2024

Ultra-Nonlinear Subcycle Photoemission of Few-Electron States from Sharp Gold Nanotapers.

Germann Hergert, Rasmus Lampe, Andreas Wöste, Christoph Lienau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nano letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Germann HergertInstitut für Physik and Center for Nanoscale Dynamics (CeNaD), Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Carl-von-Ossietzky Str. 9-11, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1238-5345
Rasmus LampeInstitut für Physik and Center for Nanoscale Dynamics (CeNaD), Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Carl-von-Ossietzky Str. 9-11, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-1442-1863
Andreas WösteInstitut für Physik and Center for Nanoscale Dynamics (CeNaD), Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Carl-von-Ossietzky Str. 9-11, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4648-7259
Christoph LienauInstitut für Physik and Center for Nanoscale Dynamics (CeNaD), Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Carl-von-Ossietzky Str. 9-11, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3854-5025

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The generation of ultrashort electron wavepackets is crucial for the development of ultrafast electron microscopes. Recent studies on Coulomb-correlated few-electron number states, photoemitted from sharp metallic tapers, have shown emission nonlinearities in the multiphoton photoemission regime which scale with the electron number. Here, we study few-electron photoemission from gold nanotapers triggered by few-cycle near-infrared pulses, demonstrating extreme 20th-order nonlinearities for electron triplets. We report interferometric autocorrelation traces of the electron yield that are quenched to a single emission peak with subfemtosecond duration due to these high nonlinearities. The modulation of the emission yield by the carrier-envelope phase suggests that electron emission predominantly occurs during a single half cycle of the driving laser field. When applying a bias voltage to the tip, recollisions in the electron trajectories are suppressed and coherent subcycle electron beams are generated with promising prospects for ultrafast electron microscopy with subcycle time resolution.

Indexed as

Electron number statesLow energy electronsOptical near-fieldsPoint-projection electron microscopyUltrafast electron emission

Identifiers

PMID39162290
PMCPMC11378295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.