Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39162133›Full record

ReviewAsian journal of andrology2025

Technologies to improve sperm retrieval in men undergoing micro-TESE for NOA.

Parviz K Kavoussi, Widi Atmoko, Germar-Michael Pinggera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian journal of andrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Parviz K KavoussiDepartment of Reproductive Urology, Austin Fertility and Reproductive Medicine/Westlake IVF, Austin, TX 78746, USA.
Widi AtmokoDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia.
Germar-Michael PinggeraDepartment of Urology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck 6020, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractNonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) is considered the most challenging clinical scenario for infertile men and current treatments leave many men unsuccessful at being able to achieve a pregnancy with their partner using their own sperm. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) is the choice for men with NOA desiring to father children with their own gametes. Micro-TESE results in the highest numbers of sperm cells retrieved for use with in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. With suboptimal micro-TESE success rates of sperm retrieval and then pregnancy and live birth using the retrieved sperm with in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, advances to improve outcomes are necessary. This article comprehensively reviews the technologies investigated to date to improve the outcomes for men undergoing micro-TESE.

Indexed as

AzoospermiaSperm RetrievalFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansMaleMicrodissectionPregnancySperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicTestisintracytoplasmic sperm injectionmicrodissection testicular sperm extractionnonobstructive azoospermia

Identifiers

PMID39162133
PMCPMC12112927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.