Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39162128›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of primatology2025

Sex differences in the acoustic structure of terrestrial alarm calls in vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus).

Colin Dubreuil, Hugh Notman, Louise Barrett, Peter Henzi, Mary Susan McDonald Pavelka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of primatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Loud Call Production in Male Vervet Monkeys (International journal of primatology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Colin DubreuilDepartment of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-8789-8519
Hugh NotmanDepartment of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4853-8809
Louise BarrettDepartment of Psychology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.
Peter HenziDepartment of Psychology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6175-1674
Mary Susan McDonald PavelkaDepartment of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-2195-4100

Funding

Faculty of Graduate Studies at the University of CalgaryKillam TrustsNational Research Foundation (South Africa) grantsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The alarm calls of vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) have been the subject of considerable focus by researchers, owing primarily to the purported referential qualities of different alarm call types. With this focus on reference, acoustic variation among calls elicited by the same range of predators has typically been overlooked. Specifically, at least one type of alarm call-the terrestrial alarm-was described over 50 years ago as being acoustically distinct between males and females-a description that has largely eluded more systematic scrutiny. Here, we provide a quantitative acoustic analysis and comparison of terrestrial alarm calls produced by adult male and female vervet monkeys. We use a random forest model to determine which acoustic variables best distinguish between the calls of males and females, and use an unsupervised clustering technique to objectively determine whether alarms produced by each sex fall into discrete types. We found that the calls of males and females differed most in frequency-based parameters, with male alarms containing more energy at lower frequencies relative to females. Calls produced by males were also of longer duration, and consisted of longer individual call elements relative to female calls. While calls generally fell into clusters associated with either male or female alarms, we found that some fell into atypical clusters given the caller's sex, and that the clusters themselves showed evidence of intergradation. We discuss these results in terms of potential differences in the function of, and motivation for, calling by males and females. We emphasize the need for a more holistic approach to the classification of vocal signals that considers contextual, functional, and structural variation.

Indexed as

Vocalization, AnimalAcousticsAnimalsChlorocebus aethiopsFemaleMaleSex CharacteristicsSex Factorsalarm callbioacousticscall structureChlorocebus pygerythruscommunicationpredator modelsexual selection

Identifiers

PMID39162128
PMCPMC11650924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.