Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39161949›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2024

Putting meat on the bone: how to fast-track innovative medicines to those who need them and generate data to justify continued use.

Daniel Ollendorf, Christopher Henshall, Marie Phillips, Patricia Synnott, Lloyd Sansom, Sean Tunis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel OllendorfCenter for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6016-8129
Christopher HenshallOffice of Health Economics, London SE1 2HB, United Kingdom.
Marie PhillipsCenter for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7287-4668
Patricia SynnottCenter for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3824-4380
Lloyd SansomUniversity of South Australia, Kent Town, South Australia 5071, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6735-5314
Sean TunisCenter for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0235-5289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulatory agencies worldwide have taken significant steps to expedite approval and market authorization of medicines based on their potential to address areas of significant unmet medical need and severe disease burden. However, initial approval of such medicines is often accompanied by limited evidence of benefit, posing a conundrum for payers and health systems who may desire greater certainty of their value. This paper describes a system of "accelerated access" to manage these tensions and coordinate activities across stakeholders, based on discussions held at a multi-stakeholder convening in June 2023. We focus on 6 core, near-term actions that can be taken to improve the current system: clarifying criteria for expedited regulatory approval, enhancing stakeholder coordination, creating expedited pathways in payer and health technology assessment settings, developing joint regulatory/payer/health technology assessment guidance on study design and data needs, linking pricing policy to data uncertainty, and improving patient and public understanding of the processes involved as well as the risks and benefits of the relevant medicines. Many of these actions will require additional resources and personnel, and some will necessitate unprecedented levels of coordination. Nevertheless, each action is designed to work with minimal adjustments to the current system rather than demanding an entirely new approach.

Indexed as

drug approvalsFDAhealth technology assessment (HTA)market authorizationregulatory approval

Identifiers

PMID39161949
PMCPMC11332269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.