ArticleObesity pillars2024
Navigating coverage: A qualitative study exploring the perceived impact of an insurance company policy to discontinue coverage of antiobesity medication.
Article in Obesity pillars, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Employee perceptions and experiences with tirzepatide treatment for obesity or overweight in the US: Insights from the PERCEPTIONS Survey.Obesity pillars · 2026Article
- Assessing the impact of pharmacist-led interventions on glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist access and treatment outcomes.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- To Reenvision and Redefine: Considering the Role of Lifestyle Interventions in the New Era of Second-Generation Obesity Management Medications.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Pharmacologic treatment of obesity in adults: Standards of care in overweight and obesity.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2026Review
- Barriers, motivations, and understanding: A qualitative study on the acceptability of an academic weight management program.PloS one · 2026Article
- GLP-1 receptor agonists in primary care: readiness, equity, and the risk of a two-tiered obesity treatment landscape.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Review
- Application of nutrition interventions with GLP-1 based therapies: A narrative review of the challenges and solutions.Obesity pillars · 2025Review
- The Impact of Novel Medications for Obesity on Weight Stigma and Societal Attitudes: A Narrative Review.Current obesity reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Obesity rates continue to rise in the United States. Treatment includes modification of diet, exercise, behavioral modification and medical consideration including anti-obesity medications. However, multiple highly effective anti-obesity medications are expensive and with that we see insurers opting out of coverage of these medications. This has led to patients having to abruptly stop treatment with these medications. The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of non-medical discontinuance of obesity medication among patients in medical weight management programs. Methods: This is a qualitative descriptive study. Semistructured interviews were completed with participants in an academic medical weight management clinic. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Themes were identified by members of the study team through qualitative content analysis. Participants were on or about to start anti-obesity medications and were from a single insurance company which cut coverage to all anti-obesity medications. Results: Twenty-two insured patients from across the state either currently taking or intending to take anti-obesity medications, participated. All participants were female. Few participants said they could afford the cost of the medication. Four main themes emerged: 1) Feelings of hope replaced by hopelessness upon loss of medication coverage, 2) Anger regarding the perceived injustice of anti-obesity medication coverage termination, 3) Perceptions of past and present stigma within the healthcare system and insurance company, 4) Generational influences on obesity treatment. Conclusion: Patients perceive the discontinuation of anti-obesity medication coverage as stigmatizing and unjust, leading to feelings of hopelessness and fear. With more insurance companies denying coverage for these costly medications more information is needed to identify best ways to address the loss of coverage with patients. Clinical management of these patients should incorporate evidence-based obesity treatments while navigating insurance constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.