Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39161945›Full record

ArticleObesity pillars2024

Navigating coverage: A qualitative study exploring the perceived impact of an insurance company policy to discontinue coverage of antiobesity medication.

Treah Haggerty, Patricia Dekeseredy, Joanna Bailey, Abigail Cowher, Adam Baus, Laura Davisson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity pillars, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Treah HaggertyDepartment of Family Medicine, Director of Pediatric Medical Weight Management, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
Patricia DekeseredyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
Joanna BaileyTug River Health Association, 5883 Black Diamond Highway, Gary, WV, 24836, USA.
Abigail CowherSchool of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
Adam BausDepartment of Social & Behavioral Sciences, Office of Health Services Research West Virginia University School of Public Health, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
Laura DavissonDepartment of Medicine, Director of Medical Weight Management, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Obesity rates continue to rise in the United States. Treatment includes modification of diet, exercise, behavioral modification and medical consideration including anti-obesity medications. However, multiple highly effective anti-obesity medications are expensive and with that we see insurers opting out of coverage of these medications. This has led to patients having to abruptly stop treatment with these medications. The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of non-medical discontinuance of obesity medication among patients in medical weight management programs. Methods: This is a qualitative descriptive study. Semistructured interviews were completed with participants in an academic medical weight management clinic. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Themes were identified by members of the study team through qualitative content analysis. Participants were on or about to start anti-obesity medications and were from a single insurance company which cut coverage to all anti-obesity medications. Results: Twenty-two insured patients from across the state either currently taking or intending to take anti-obesity medications, participated. All participants were female. Few participants said they could afford the cost of the medication. Four main themes emerged: 1) Feelings of hope replaced by hopelessness upon loss of medication coverage, 2) Anger regarding the perceived injustice of anti-obesity medication coverage termination, 3) Perceptions of past and present stigma within the healthcare system and insurance company, 4) Generational influences on obesity treatment. Conclusion: Patients perceive the discontinuation of anti-obesity medication coverage as stigmatizing and unjust, leading to feelings of hopelessness and fear. With more insurance companies denying coverage for these costly medications more information is needed to identify best ways to address the loss of coverage with patients. Clinical management of these patients should incorporate evidence-based obesity treatments while navigating insurance constraints.

Indexed as

Discontinue insurance coverageObesity medicationObesity medicinePolicy changeQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID39161945
PMCPMC11332068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.