Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39161944›Full record

ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2024

A comparison of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptides (CCP3 and CCP3.1) autoantibody tests in rheumatoid arthritis.

Heather A Nelson, Dipanwita Banerjee, Camille L Novis, Kevin D Deane, Marie L Feser, Vijayalakshmi Nandakumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heather A NelsonARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Dipanwita BanerjeeARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Camille L NovisARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Kevin D DeaneUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Marie L FeserUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Vijayalakshmi NandakumarARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

Core 2 - Mucosal Immunobiology Core (MIC)P30AR079369 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Vernon Michael Holers · 2021 to 2026
$4.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR079369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) are a specific serological biomarker used in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In clinical practice ACPA can be identified using immunoassays targeting synthetic cyclic citrullinated peptides (CCP). The 3rd generation anti-CCP IgG antibody (CCP3) offers improved sensitivity compared to the earlier versions. Recently, CCP3.1, capable of detecting both IgG and IgA antibodies, was introduced to enhance sensitivity, especially in patients with early RA. Methods: We assessed serum CCP3.1 against CCP3 in 331 subjects undergoing RA panel serology, comprising 136 patients with RA and 195 patients without RA. Sera were tested for anti-CCP IgG (CCP3) and anti-CCP IgG/IgA (CCP3.1) antibodies. Clinical performance of these tests was compared at manufacturer-suggested cutoffs. A separate set of 81 patients with a diagnosis of RA by 2010 criteria and whose samples were obtained from within 1-year of RA diagnosis was similarly assessed to evaluate assay performance in an independent clinical RA cohort. Results: Overall diagnostic accuracy was similar; CCP3 had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88, CCP3.1 had an AUC of 0.89. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for CCP3 were 79 %, 91 %, 86 %, and 86 %, respectively. For CCP3.1, sensitivity was 78 %, specificity 93 %, PPV 89 %, NPV 86 %. Both assays demonstrated excellent agreement; positive percent agreement of 94 % and negative percent agreement of 99 %. Conclusion: Our findings indicate comparable diagnostic accuracy between CCP3 and CCP3.1 assays in these clinical cohorts.

Indexed as

Cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodiesDiagnostic performanceRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID39161944
PMCPMC11332063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.