ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2024
A comparison of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptides (CCP3 and CCP3.1) autoantibody tests in rheumatoid arthritis.
Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Autoantibodies and T Cells Target Citrullinated and Homocitrullinated Antigens in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Presence of autoantibodies targeting the shared epitope in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic utility and clinical relevance of anti-MCV and anti-CCP antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) are a specific serological biomarker used in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In clinical practice ACPA can be identified using immunoassays targeting synthetic cyclic citrullinated peptides (CCP). The 3rd generation anti-CCP IgG antibody (CCP3) offers improved sensitivity compared to the earlier versions. Recently, CCP3.1, capable of detecting both IgG and IgA antibodies, was introduced to enhance sensitivity, especially in patients with early RA. Methods: We assessed serum CCP3.1 against CCP3 in 331 subjects undergoing RA panel serology, comprising 136 patients with RA and 195 patients without RA. Sera were tested for anti-CCP IgG (CCP3) and anti-CCP IgG/IgA (CCP3.1) antibodies. Clinical performance of these tests was compared at manufacturer-suggested cutoffs. A separate set of 81 patients with a diagnosis of RA by 2010 criteria and whose samples were obtained from within 1-year of RA diagnosis was similarly assessed to evaluate assay performance in an independent clinical RA cohort. Results: Overall diagnostic accuracy was similar; CCP3 had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88, CCP3.1 had an AUC of 0.89. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for CCP3 were 79 %, 91 %, 86 %, and 86 %, respectively. For CCP3.1, sensitivity was 78 %, specificity 93 %, PPV 89 %, NPV 86 %. Both assays demonstrated excellent agreement; positive percent agreement of 94 % and negative percent agreement of 99 %. Conclusion: Our findings indicate comparable diagnostic accuracy between CCP3 and CCP3.1 assays in these clinical cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.