Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39161933›Full record

ArticleJB & JS open access

Intra-Articular Corrective Osteotomy for Distal Radial Intra-Articular Malunion Using Patient-Matched Instruments: A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Trial.

Kunihiro Oka, Satoshi Miyamura, Ryoya Shiode, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Norimasa Iwasaki, Daisuke Kawamura, Kazuki Sato, Takuji Iwamoto, Michiro Yamamoto, Keiichiro Nishida and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kunihiro OkaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7770-4634
Satoshi MiyamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2245-5554
Ryoya ShiodeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3148-0399
Hiroyuki TanakaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8622-7422
Norimasa IwasakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5496-4046
Daisuke KawamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5592-3791
Kazuki SatoInstitute for Integrated Sports Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0586-1868
Takuji IwamotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7605-6727
Michiro YamamotoDepartment of Hand Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6753-538X
Keiichiro NishidaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1260-586X
Yasunori ShimamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama, Japan.
Tomomi YamadaData Coordinating Center, Department of Medical Innovation, Osaka University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5855-8897
Seiji OkadaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5107-8209
Tsuyoshi MuraseDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5628-5891

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Corrective osteotomy for intra-articular malunion is a challenging procedure. However, recent advancements, including patient-matched instruments created on the basis of preoperative computer simulation, enable accurate intra-articular correction. We hypothesized that intra-articular corrective osteotomy using patient-matched instruments for the treatment of distal radial intra-articular malunion would reduce intra-articular deformity and restore wrist function at 12 months of follow-up. Methods: This prospective study included 12 patients with distal radial intra-articular malunion who underwent intra-articular corrective osteotomy external to the joint using patient-matched instruments. The primary end point was the maximum step-off on the articular surface of the distal radius, measured with use of computed tomography (CT), with an expected postoperative value of ≤1.5 mm. The secondary end points included the gap of the articular surface; range of motion; grip strength; pain evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS); patient satisfaction; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score; and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score. A mean postoperative step-off of ≤1.5 mm for the primary end point was assessed with use of the 1-sample t test. The secondary end points were assessed with use of the Dunnett multiple comparison test. Results: The average step-off significantly improved from 3.75 ± 1.04 mm preoperatively to 0.51 ± 0.40 mm at the 52-week postoperative follow-up and was maintained within 1.5 mm. The average wrist and forearm range of motion, VAS score, grip strength, DASH score, and PRWE score significantly improved. Eleven patients were either very satisfied or satisfied with their outcomes. Conclusions: The use of patient-matched instruments could contribute to improving postoperative outcomes of intra-articular corrective osteotomy procedures involving the distal radius. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Identifiers

PMID39161933
PMCPMC11328987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.