Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39161879›Full record

ArticleData in brief2024

Dataset of received optical power on pork meat for optical in-body communications studies.

Syifaul Fuada, Mariella Särestöniemi, Malalgodage Amila Nilantha Perera, Marcos Katz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Syifaul FuadaCentre for Wireless Communications, Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Oulu, Oulu 90570, Finland.
Mariella SärestöniemiCentre for Wireless Communications, Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Oulu, Oulu 90570, Finland.
Malalgodage Amila Nilantha PereraCentre for Wireless Communications, Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Oulu, Oulu 90570, Finland.
Marcos KatzCentre for Wireless Communications, Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Oulu, Oulu 90570, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The utilization of actual biological tissue (e.g., pork meat samples) and tissue-mimicking phantoms for optical-based in-body data and energy transfer studies is crucial. Near-infrared (NIR) light, a part of the light spectrum that falls between visible light and infrared, is highly advantageous as a carrier for data transmission due to its superior ability to penetrate biological tissue, for instance, the human body. Using pork meat samples as a propagation medium for prolonged experiments is challenging due to the deterioration of meat quality caused by drying in the temperature chamber. Typically, a controlled-temperature chamber can be utilized to warm the tissue samples to 37 °C. Some experiments need to be carried out over long periods, in some cases exceeding one hour, including the demonstration of transmitting large-size data (e.g., high-definition images or videos) in real-time through biological tissue using NIR LED. Moreover, for statistical analysis, some experiments need to be repeated, therefore degradation of the tissue sample should be avoided. Furthermore, experiments may also encompass investigations into optical wireless power transfer (OWPT) conducted on biological tissues under NIR illumination and employing energy harvester-based commercial photovoltaic cells (PV) at the receiving ends, which would require a long time to charge the storage (e.g., battery or supercapacitor) fully. Using phantoms for such an experiment is also not straightforward, requiring careful consideration, such as standardization issues. One possible approach to address this challenge is to conduct experiments in a free-space environment (e.g., sample-free) while guaranteeing that the optical power received in free-space is equivalent to that obtained through biological tissue. This can be achieved by carefully controlling the LED's current and arranging the optical channel's distance to achieve comparable results. The received optical power is the primary parameter for comparing free-space and biological tissue setups. This dataset provides settings for NIR LEDs (

Indexed as

Free-spaceIn-body communicationNear-infraredOpticalPhantomsPork meat sample

Identifiers

PMID39161879
PMCPMC11332801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.