SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2024
Mesenchymal stem cells for peripheral nerve injury and regeneration: a bibliometric and visualization study.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics technologies: Novel tools and methods for assessing nerve injury and regeneration.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Synergistic Enhancement of Facial Nerve Regeneration Using a Cellulose-Based Nerve Conduit Loaded with Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Human Placental Extract.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Few-Layered Conductive Graphene Foams for Electrical Transdifferentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Into Schwann Cell-Like Phenotypes.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Combined use of olfactory mucosal mesenchymal stem cells conditioned medium and neural guide conduits promotes nerve regeneration in an ovine model.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To use bibliometric methods to analyze the research hotspots and future development trends regarding the application of mesenchymal stem cells in peripheral nerve injury and regeneration. Methods: Articles published from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2023, were meticulously screened using the MeSH terms: TS = ("Mesenchymal stem cells" AND "Peripheral nerve injury") OR TS = ("Mesenchymal stem cells" AND "Peripheral nerve regeneration") within the Web of Science database. The compiled data was then subjected to in-depth analysis with the aid of VOSviewer and Cite Space software, which facilitated the identification of the most productive countries, organizations, authors, and the predominant keywords prevalent within this research domain. Results: An extensive search of the Web of Science database yielded 350 relevant publications. These scholarly works were authored by 2,049 collaborative researchers representing 41 countries and affiliated with 585 diverse academic and research institutions. The findings from this research were disseminated across 167 various journals, and the publications collectively cited 21,064 references from 3,339 distinct journals. Conclusion: Over the past decade, there has been a consistent upward trajectory in the number of publications and citations pertaining to the use of mesenchymal stem cells in the realm of peripheral nerve injury and regeneration. The domain of stem cell therapy for nerve injury has emerged as a prime focus of research, with mesenchymal stem cell therapy taking center stage due to its considerable promise in the treatment of nerve injuries. This therapeutic approach holds the potential to significantly enhance treatment options and rehabilitation prospects for patients suffering from such injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.