ArticleHeliyon2024
A unified component-based data-driven framework to support interoperability in the healthcare systems.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Rethinking secondary immunodeficiency: a cross-domain pathway framework for risk stratification.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Development and Evaluation of SNOMED CT Automated Mapping Tool: Advancing Terminology Standardization and Semantic Interoperability.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Health care management in Africa: a debate for future research and agenda.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Structuring integration for patient-centered care: a review-informed ontology-driven modular front-end framework for digital health innovation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Bridging clinic to home: domestic devices in dermatological diagnostics and treatments.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare organizations must urgently prioritize interoperability to enhance the quality of care they provide. However, achieving this collaboration comes with numerous challenges, including differing approaches, data formats, and standards, as well as concerns about privacy, security, technical complexity, and legal and regulatory issues. To tackle these challenges, we determined a set of interoperability solutions. We also developed a comprehensive, component-based, data-driven framework for healthcare systems. Our study's approach involved three main steps: first, conducting a literature review to gather interoperability requirements and solutions from online databases and grey literature; second, carrying out a qualitative study to develop a framework based on the review results and focus group discussions; and third, using the Delphi method to validate the framework with experts. We extracted information from 36 articles during the screening and assessment process. Based on the proposed framework, we organized the identified themes into various categories, including architecture, architecture components, standards, platforms, policies, data sources, consumers, applications, level of interoperability, healthcare facilities, and considerations. Experts believe that establishing a comprehensive architecture for launching interoperability between health information systems can greatly facilitate this process. All framework components (totaling 197) received unanimous approval. The landscape of healthcare delivery is shifting from a focus on diseases to a patient-centered, data-driven approach. There is a growing demand for personalized healthcare systems, which necessitates increased interoperability among all healthcare stakeholders, particularly when dealing with diverse types of data. Our framework is designed to facilitate the implementation of various types of interoperability in healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.