ArticleOphthalmology science
Biological and Methodological Variability in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer OCT: The Framingham Heart Study.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-driven multimodal retinal imaging for early detection and risk stratification of vascular and neurodegenerative diseases.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Investigating the Utility of Fractal Measures as a Diagnostic for Glaucoma.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Sectoral Analysis of Corneal Thickness in Glaucoma and Healthy Eyes and Its Relationship with RNFL and Rim Area.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- An Exploratory Study of Six-Month Niacinamide Supplementation on Macular Structure and Electrophysiology in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Quantitative Analysis of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Using SPECTRALIS Glaucoma Module Premium Edition and SPECTRALIS Standard Glaucoma Module.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- The Association of Retinal Capillary Density and Retinal Thickness in Diabetic Retinopathy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Influence of OSCAR-IB Criteria on Test-Retest Reliability of Cirrus HD-OCT Retinal Thickness Measurements in People With Multiple Sclerosis.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2025Article
- Interocular Asymmetry of OCT Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Values in a Normative Population: The Framingham Heart Study.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To explore participant-level biological attributes and scan-level methodological attributes associated with retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness variability in a population-based sample of elderly United States adults. Design: Cross-sectional analysis using data from the Framingham Heart Study. Participants: One thousand three hundred forty-seven eyes from 825 participants with ≥1 OCT scan and axial length data were included. Methods: Three or more successive RNFL scans of each eye of each participant were obtained in a single session. Multivariable linear mixed models were employed to explore the associations between average RNFL thickness with participant-level biological attributes (age, gender, race, ethnicity, and axial length) and scan-level attributes (signal strength [SS]) as independent variables in the whole population as well as a subsample of adults with no self-reported history of glaucoma. Similar analyses were designed to assess methodological variability with average within-eye standard deviation (SD) for repeated scans as the dependent variable. Main Outcomes Measures: (1) Biological variability: average RNFL thickness, and (2) methodological variability: average within-participant SD across repeated scans. Results: Age (β = Conclusions: Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness is lower with older age, male gender, greater axial length, lower SS, and Whites (as compared with African Americans) without self-reported glaucoma. Measurement variability (SD) is higher with greater RNFL thickness and lower SS. Understanding these biological and methodological variations is important to aid in OCT interpretation. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.