ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2024
Integrative prediction model for radiation pneumonitis incorporating genetic and clinical-pathological factors using machine learning.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated machine learning risk model for predicting radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients with interstitial lung disease.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Application of corticosteroid therapy with esophageal cancer: a case report in the treatment of radiation-induced and immune-related pneumonia.AME case reports · 2026Article
- Machine learning for early prediction of secondary cancer after radiotherapy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Pattern-based volumetric CT quantification to predict radiation pneumonitis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who have diffuse parenchymal lung disease.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to develop a machine learning-based prediction model for severe radiation pneumonitis (RP) by integrating relevant clinicopathological and genetic factors, considering the associations of clinical, dosimetric parameters, and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of genes in the TGF-β1 pathway with RP. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 59 primary lung cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy and analyzed pretreatment blood samples, clinicopathological/dosimetric variables, and 11 functional SNPs in TGFβ pathway genes. Using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) and nested cross-validation, we developed a machine learning-based prediction model for severe RP (grade ≥ 2). Feature selection was conducted using four methods (filtered-based, wrapper-based, embedded, and logistic regression), and performance was evaluated using three machine learning models. Results: Severe RP occurred in 20.3 % of patients with a median follow-up of 39.7 months. In our final model, age (>66 years), smoking history, PTV volume (>300 cc), and AG/GG genotype in BMP2 rs1979855 were identified as the most significant predictors. Additionally, incorporating genomic variables for prediction alongside clinicopathological variables significantly improved the AUC compared to using clinicopathological variables alone (0.822 vs. 0.741, p = 0.029). The same feature set was selected using both the wrapper-based method and logistic model, demonstrating the best performance across all machine learning models (AUC: XGBoost 0.815, RF 0.805, SVM 0.712, respectively). Conclusion: We successfully developed a machine learning-based prediction model for RP, demonstrating age, smoking history, PTV volume, and BMP2 rs1979855 genotype as significant predictors. Notably, incorporating SNP data significantly enhanced predictive performance compared to clinicopathological factors alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.