ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2024
3D Unsupervised deep learning method for magnetic resonance imaging-to-computed tomography synthesis in prostate radiotherapy.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-to-computed tomography (CT) synthesis is essential in MRI-only radiotherapy workflows, particularly through deep learning techniques known for their accuracy. However, current supervised methods are limited to specific center's learnings and depend on registration precision. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of unsupervised and supervised approaches in the context of prostate MRI-to-CT generation for radiotherapy dose calculation. Methods: CT/MRI image pairs from 99 prostate cancer patients across three different centers were used. A comparison between supervised and unsupervised conditional Generative Adversarial Networks (cGAN) was conducted. Unsupervised training incorporates a style transfer method with. Content and Style Representation for Enhanced Perceptual synthesis (CREPs) loss. For dose evaluation, the photon prescription dose was 60 Gy delivered in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Imaging endpoint for sCT evaluation was Mean Absolute Error (MAE). Dosimetric endpoints included absolute dose differences and gamma analysis between CT and sCT dose calculations. Results: The unsupervised paired network exhibited the highest accuracy for the body with a MAE at 33.6 HU, the highest MAE was 45.5 HU obtained with unsupervised unpaired learning. All architectures provided clinically acceptable results for dose calculation with gamma pass rates above 94 % (1 % 1 mm 10 %). Conclusions: This study shows that multicenter data can produce accurate sCTs via unsupervised learning, eliminating CT-MRI registration. The sCTs not only matched HU values but also enabled precise dose calculations, suggesting their potential for wider use in MRI-only radiotherapy workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.