ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Customized Mobile App for Residents Rotating Through Pediatric Critical Care Unit.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Physicians often use mobile apps for patient care, but few apps are dedicated to pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM). This study developed a mobile app specifically for Pediatric Critical Care Unit (PICU) residents to aid their onboarding process and aimed to assess whether it could enhance their confidence and comfort levels. Method: From March 2020 to April 2021, 90 residents participated and completed pre- and post-rotation quizzes with 20 questions each. Quiz score differences between the control and app groups were analyzed using t-tests. A survey was also administered at the end of the rotation to compare comfort level and confidence in PCCM knowledge pre- and post-rotation. Results: Enrollment included 50 residents in the control group and 40 in the app group. The participation rate was 100%, but not all participants completed both quizzes and survey. The app group showed a significantly greater improvement in quiz scores from pre- to post-rotation compared to the control group (increase of 0.23 questions vs 1.67, p = 0.045). However, the two groups had no significant differences in confidence in PCCM knowledge (p = 0.246) or comfort levels (p = 0.776) in the PICU. Conclusions: This study found no significant difference in confidence levels between the App and control groups at the end of the PICU rotation. However, the App group outperformed the control group in knowledge assessments. Frequent use of the app likely reinforced essential concepts and facilitated adaptation to the PICU service. Overall, the app's positive impact on knowledge and adaptation indicates it is a valuable tool for enhancing medical residents' educational experiences in busy clinical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.