Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39161631›Full record

ArticlePersoonia2024

F Liu, Z-D Hu, A Yurkov, X-H Chen, W-J Bao, Q Ma, W-N Zhao, S Pan, X-M Zhao, J-H Liu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Persoonia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Dimerization of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Microbial ecology of fermented foods.FEMS yeast research · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. An update on clinically relevant, rare, and emergingClinical microbiology reviews · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

F LiuSchool of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Sciences and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, Hebei, China.
Z-D HuSchool of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Sciences and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, Hebei, China.
A YurkovLeibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Braunschweig, Germany.
X-H ChenSchool of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Sciences and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, Hebei, China.
W-J BaoSchool of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Sciences and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, Hebei, China.
Q MaSchool of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Sciences and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, Hebei, China.
W-N ZhaoSchool of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Sciences and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, Hebei, China.
S PanSchool of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Sciences and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, Hebei, China.
X-M ZhaoSchool of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Sciences and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, Hebei, China.
J-H LiuSchool of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Sciences and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, Hebei, China.
Q-M WangSchool of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Sciences and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, Hebei, China.
T BoekhoutCollege of Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A correct classification of fungi, including yeasts, is of prime importance to understand fungal biodiversity and to communicate about this diversity. Fungal genera are mainly defined based on phenotypic characteristics and the results of single or multigene-based phylogenetic analyses. However, because yeasts often have less phenotypic characters, their classification experienced a strong move towards DNA-based data, from short ribosomal sequences to multigene phylogenies and more recently to phylogenomics. Here, we explore the usefulness of various genomics-based parameters to circumscribe fungal genera more correctly taking the yeast domain as an example. Therefore, we compared the results of a phylogenomic analysis, average amino acid identity (AAI) values, the presence of conserved signature indels (CSIs), the percentage of conserved proteins (POCP) and the presence-absence patterns of orthologs (PAPO). These genome-based metrics were used to investigate their usefulness in demarcating 13 hitherto relatively well accepted genera in

Indexed as

AAIbarcodeCSInew taxaPAPOphenotypic comparisonsphylogenomicsPOCPtaxonomyyeasts

Identifiers

PMID39161631
PMCPMC11319838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.