ArticlePEC innovation2024
A combined diabetes and continuous glucose monitoring education program for adults with type 2 diabetes.
Article in PEC innovation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Nurse-Led Educational Intervention for Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring.Worldviews on evidence-based nursing · 2026Trial
- Expanding the Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Impact on Glycemic Control and Metabolic Health.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The lack of descriptions for education programs in studies evaluating the efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) compared to blood glucose monitoring (BGM) for individuals with T2DM makes it difficult to compare results across trials. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a new education program for adults with insulin-treated T2DM and HbA1c ≥58 mmol/mol (7.5 %) initiating CGM. Methods: A 3-h education program was created to provide information on diabetes self-management and CGM or BGM based on international guidelines and a pre-evaluation based on user needs assessment. Questionnaires were used to post-evaluate participant-rated benefits from the program. Results: Seven individuals attended a user needs assessment of the program and 96 participated in the final education program (61.5 % men, mean age 61 (59.5;63) years, mean diabetes duration 18.2 (16.9;19.5) years, and median HbA1c 69 (63-78)mmol/mol (8.5 (7.9-9.3)%). Benefit from this program was rated good/very good by 95.5 % with no statistically significant difference between glucose monitoring groups. Conclusions: This study presents a new well-received education program for T2DM for both the CGM and BGM group. Innovation: The description of the development process and the education provided for both glucose monitoring groups may be useful for CGM initiation in clinics and trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.