Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39161585›Full record

ReviewMediastinum (Hong Kong, China)2024

Re-evaluation and operative indications after induction therapy for thymic epithelial tumors.

Yoshito Yamada, Masatsugu Hamaji, Harutaro Okada, Akihiro Takahagi, Hitomi Ajimizu, Sho Koyasu, Yuichi Sakamori, Akihiro Aoyama

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yoshito YamadaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7659-8067
Masatsugu HamajiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9808-8260
Harutaro OkadaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Akihiro TakahagiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Hitomi AjimizuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Sho KoyasuDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuichi SakamoriDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Society Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan.
Akihiro AoyamaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), encompassing thymoma and thymic carcinoma, represent a rare and heterogeneous group of thoracic malignancies with varying prognoses and treatment strategies. Surgical resection is the cornerstone of therapy for localized stages, but the management of locally advanced or unresectable TETs often involves induction therapy, including chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, as a neoadjuvant approach aimed at downstaging the tumor to facilitate subsequent resection. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the re-evaluation process and operative indications following induction therapy for TETs, highlighting the pivotal role of accurate assessment in guiding surgical decisions and optimizing patient outcomes. Induction therapy's efficacy is contingent upon precise re-evaluation methods to accurately gauge treatment response and assess resectability post-therapy. This review discusses the various modalities employed in re-evaluation, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT), and the significance of tumor markers, underlining their strengths and limitations. The adoption of modified RECIST criteria for TETs by the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG) underscores the necessity for standardized assessment guidelines to ensure consistency and reliability across studies and clinical practices. Furthermore, we explore the implications of induction therapy on surgical decision-making, emphasizing the criteria for determining the suitability of patients for surgical intervention post-therapy. The review addresses the challenges and future perspectives associated with the re-evaluation process, including the potential for advanced imaging techniques and the integration of molecular and genetic markers to enhance the precision of treatment response assessment. In conclusion, the re-evaluation of TETs post-induction therapy is a complex but critical component of the multidisciplinary management approach for these patients. Standardizing re-evaluation methodologies and incorporating novel diagnostic tools could significantly improve the prognostication and treatment stratification, ultimately enhancing the therapeutic outcomes for patients with advanced TETs.

Indexed as

induction therapyre-evaluationre-stagingThymic epithelial tumors (TETs)

Identifiers

PMID39161585
PMCPMC11330912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.