ArticleJournal of patient experience2024
A Brief Patient-Recorded Audio File Called TIMS (This Is My Story) Improves Communication and Empathy for Healthcare Teams in the Hospital.
Article in Journal of patient experience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large Language Model-Enabled Editing of Patient Audio Interviews From "This Is My Story" Conversations: Comparative Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Impressions of Recording a Brief Audio File Known as a TIMS (This is My Story) File.Journal of patient experience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our objective was to assess the impact of a 4-question patient audio interview (this is my story [TIMS]) on medical staff empathy and communication with hospitalized patients and loved ones. We recorded a 4-question audio interview with patients and posted it to the electronic health record. We used a cross-sectional, mixed methods design to pilot this patient version of the TIMS intervention. To evaluate the intervention we collected a brief evaluation survey and conducted semistructured interviews with medical staff. Fifty-three participants responded to our TIMS evaluation survey. Fifty of 51 respondents reported the TIMS file contained useful information. Twenty-four respondents reported listening to the file decreased their distress. Most responded that they either did not have distress or the TIMS file did not change their distress. Of concern, 3 people reported that listening to the file increased their distress. Importantly, most respondents reported feeling greater empathy for the patient after listening (53%) and most reported listening improved their communication with family members (63%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.