ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2024
Early to late explantation of Hydrus microstent MIGS device: A case series.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Systematic and Narrative Review of Safety and Complications in Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) Between 2014-2024.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Six-Month Outcomes from a Prospective, Randomized Study of iStent infinite Versus Hydrus in Open-Angle Glaucoma: The INTEGRITY Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: The Hydrus microstent was approved by the FDA in August 2018 for use with cataract surgery to reduce IOP in patients with mild to moderate primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). Pivotal clinical trials demonstrated its overall safety and efficacy in lowering IOP. However, malpositioning of the implant can result in uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema (UGH) syndrome necessitating device explantation. Here we report four such cases and their associated challenges. We also highlight the importance of early recognition of post-operative complications for ease of implant removal. Observations: Case 1: A 75-year-old female patient was referred for chronic granulomatous anterior uveitis with cystoid macular edema (CME) and uncontrolled IOP in the left eye after cataract extraction with Hydrus implantation. On gonioscopy, the implant was occluded and embedded in the iris. The patient underwent removal of the Hydrus implant 10 months after the initial surgery with canaloplasty to control IOP.Case 2: A 71-year-old male patient on dual anti-platelet developed intraoperative hyphema during cataract extraction with Hydrus microstent in the right eye. Post-operatively, clopidogrel was stopped, but hyphema persisted with uncontrolled IOP. The Hydrus was noted to be syneched against the iris face. The patient underwent anterior chamber washout with Hydrus explantation and Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation 16 days after the first surgery.Case 3: A 76-year-old patient developed persistent granulomatous anterior uveitis in the left eye after cataract extraction with Hydrus microstent. On gonioscopy, the Hydrus ostium was seen resting on the iris without occlusion, and the patient underwent Hydrus removal with nasal goniotomy 3 months after initial surgery.Case 4: A 63-year-old patient underwent cataract extraction with endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and a complex Hydrus microstent implantation requiring multiple attempts. Eleven months later, the patient was found to have uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome and macular edema, and the Hydrus was noted to be insufficiently inserted and posteriorly rotated with contact against the iris. The Hydrus was explanted, and nasal goniotomy was performed. Conclusions and importance: Hydrus microstents that are malpositioned can result in persistent uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome. Explantation between 2 weeks and 11 months successfully resolved post-operative uveitis and hyphema, but all cases required additional glaucoma-hyphema syndrome. Early recognition is important since late removal was more challenging due to the implant becoming embedded in the iris.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.