Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39161370›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2024

Analysis of the current usage of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in pediatric trauma patients: a retrospective observational study from the American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program databases.

Ling-Wei Kuo, Chien-Hung Liao, Chi-Tung Cheng, Chih-Yuan Fu, Chien-An Liao, Chia-Cheng Wang, Jen-Fu Huang, Chi-Po Hsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ling-Wei KuoDepartment of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6489-3723
Chien-Hung LiaoDepartment of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-2812-9773
Chi-Tung ChengDepartment of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2697-4642
Chih-Yuan FuDepartment of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chien-An LiaoDepartment of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chia-Cheng WangDepartment of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Jen-Fu HuangDepartment of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chi-Po HsuDepartment of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has been an established life-saving procedure for adult trauma patients, but the evidence for its use in pediatric patients is still under question. The purpose of this study was to examine the outcome of REBOA in pediatric patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed observational cohort data from the American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program from 2017 to 2019. We analyzed 183 506 trauma patients aged 7-18, and 111 patients were matched by propensity score analysis. Basic demographics, injury severity, trauma type, and clinical outcomes of the patients receiving REBOA and those not receiving REBOA were compared. In the REBOA patients, a subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the potential influence of age and body weight on the outcomes of REBOA. Results: After the pretreatment factors were balanced for the REBOA and no-REBOA groups, the patients in the REBOA group had more transfused packed red blood cells within the first 4 hours (3250 mL vs. 600 mL, p<0.001), and the mortality rate was higher in the REBOA group, but it did not reach statistical significance (56.8% vs. 36.5%, p=0.067). No significant difference was detected regarding in-hospital complications. In the subgroup analysis of the patients who received REBOA, we discovered no significant difference in mortality and complications between the subgroups when compared by age (>15 years old/≤15 years old) or weight (>58 kg or ≤58 kg). Conclusions: Pediatric trauma patients who received REBOA were not significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality when compared with no-REBOA patients with matched basic demographics and pretreatment factors. Younger age and lighter body weight did not seem to influence the outcomes of REBOA regarding survival and complications. Level of evidence: Level III.

Indexed as

endovascular proceduresMultiple Traumapediatricresuscitation

Identifiers

PMID39161370
PMCPMC11331927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.