Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39161183›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2024

Changes in analgesic prescriptions in Dutch general practice.

D Veldkamp, N Pooters, H J Schers, R Akkermans, T C Olde Hartman, A A Uijen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D VeldkampDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
N PootersDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
H J SchersDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
R AkkermansDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
T C Olde HartmanDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2078-1206
A A UijenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreases in opioid prescriptions have been described; however, recent trends and prescribing patterns of analgesics in Dutch general practice are largely unknown.

objectiveTo investigate recent changes in the number of analgesic prescriptions, and the indications for prescribing strong opioids. Furthermore, we aim to identify risk factors for chronic opioid use in Dutch general practice. DESIGN AND

settingA retrospective cohort study from 1 July 2013 to 31 June 2022, using a primary care practice based research network. SUBJECTS: Patients with ≥1 prescription for analgesics during the study period were included.

main outcome measureChanges in the number of prescriptions for paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids in Dutch general practice during the 9-year study period. Moreover, we analyzed indications for prescribing strong opioids by the general practitioner (GP).

resultsA total of 18,433 analgesic users were identified. Over time, prescriptions for paracetamol, NSAIDs and weak opioids decreased, while the number of strong opioid prescriptions increased. General practitioners prescribed more strong opioids for non-malignant pain, whereas prescriptions for malignant pain remained stable over time. Risk factors for chronic opioid use (≥90 days) included older age, lower educational level, smoking status and having a history of a musculoskeletal or psychological disorder, a malignancy or sexual, physical or psychological abuse.

conclusionsConsidering the increase in strong opioid prescriptions for benign conditions, GPs need to be vigilant for patients who are at risk for chronic use. Regular monitoring and awareness for psychosocial factors in treatment of chronic pain may be key in preventing harms associated with persistent opioid use.

Indexed as

AcetaminophenAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDrug PrescriptionsGeneral PracticePractice Patterns, Physicians'AdolescentAdultAgedAnalgesicsChronic PainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsAcetaminophenAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAnalgesicschronic opioid usechronic painprimary health carerisk factors

Identifiers

PMID39161183
PMCPMC11552297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.