ArticleESC heart failure2024
The role of maximal inspiratory pressure on functional performance in adults with heart failure.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Inspiratory Muscle Strength in Functional Capacity and Left Atrial Strain in Patients With Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction.Clinical cardiology · 2026Article
- Association between ultrasound-determined characteristics of the diaphragm and respiratory function in young adults.International journal of exercise science · 2026Article
- Inspiratory muscle weakness further impairs exercise capacity and respiratory functions and increases dyspnea perception in patients with heart failure.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The role of maximal inspiratory pressure on functional performance in adults with heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExercise intolerance is common among adults with heart failure (HF) and is a strong prognostic indicator. We examined maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) as an indicator of maximal and submaximal exercise capacity in older HF patients.
methodsFifty-one patients age ≥ 50 years with HF underwent MIP testing via the PrO
resultsThe median age was 69 years [interquartile range (IQR): 66-73], and the median LVEF was 36.5% (IQR: 30%-45%). Regression identified MIP as an independent predictor for grip strength, 6MWD, 1RM weight and 30 s STS after adjustment for age, BMI and LVEF. MIP greater than the median (n = 25) independently predicted and reflected greater peak VO
conclusionThe analysis demonstrates that MIP is a novel biometric for exercise tolerance in adults with HF. Assessments of MIP are safe and convenient, with the potential to enhance routine HF surveillance and provide novel biometrics to guide HF therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.