Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39161056›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2024

Optimizing Outcomes in Distal Tibial Deformity Correction: The Role of Supramalleolar Osteotomy with Computer-assisted Hexapod External Fixator.

Xiaosong Yang, Hui Du, Xinghua Yin, Xiaofeng Gong, Yan Wang, Ying Li, Ning Sun, Liangpeng Lai, Wenjing Li, Heng Li and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Research progress on correction of severe foot and ankle deformities with digital hexapod external fixators].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Xiaosong YangDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Peking University Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3728-2322
Hui DuDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Peking University Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2048-6194
Xinghua YinDepartment of Adult Joint Reconstruction, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Peking University Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xiaofeng GongDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Peking University Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yan WangDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Peking University Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China.
Ying LiDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Peking University Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China.
Ning SunDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Peking University Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China.
Liangpeng LaiDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Peking University Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China.
Wenjing LiDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Peking University Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China.
Heng LiDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Peking University Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xing LiDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Peking University Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0679-4595
Xiaotian HeDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Beijing Da Wang Lu Emergency Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yong WuDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Peking University Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China.

Funding

Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation L222059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDistal tibial deformities can significantly impact patients if left uncorrected, often leading to pain, alterations in gait, and the eventual development of post-traumatic arthritis. The criteria for surgical correction in these patients continues to be a subject of debate, while supramalleolar osteotomy (SMO) is an effective method for correcting distal tibial deformities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical results of SMO using internal fixation or using computer-assisted hexapod external fixator in the treatment of distal tibial deformity.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted on 290 patients who underwent SMO between June 2015 and January 2023. Forty-four patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among the participants, 19 underwent SMO combined with a computer-assisted hexapod external fixator, while 25 received SMO with plate and screw internal fixation. The tibial anterior surface (TAS) angle, tibial lateral surface (TLS) angle, the tibiotalar (TT) angle and the talocrural (TC) angle were assessed on weight-bearing X-ray films. Functional assessments were performed according to the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score.

resultsThe study followed patients for an average duration of 31.7 ± 15.3 months, with a range from 12 to 67 months. Successful bone union was achieved in all cases. For patients treated with the computer-assisted hexapod external fixator, significant improvements were observed: the mean deviation in sagittal plane deformity parameters decreased from 14.3 ± 10.4 degrees preoperatively to 2.8 ± 3.8 degrees postoperatively (p < 0.05). Similarly, coronal plane deformity parameters showed a reduction from 25.9 ± 22.5 degrees preoperatively to 5.9 ± 11.0 degrees postoperatively (p < 0.05). The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score improved markedly from 66.0 ± 14.9 to 86.1 ± 11.7 points (p < 0.05). For patients undergoing internal fixation, the absolute difference in coronal plane parameters improved from 15.4 ± 12.6 degrees preoperatively to 3.7 ± 3.4 degrees postoperatively (p < 0.05). A significant enhancement in AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score was also noted, increasing from 68.3 ± 14.3 points to 79.4 ± 13.5 points (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in gender, side, follow-up time, postoperative deviation of deformity, pre- or postoperative AOFAS between the two groups.

conclusionIn conclusion, comprehensive preoperative planning of SMO combined with either internal fixation or a hexapod external fixator for treating distal tibial deformities can achieve satisfactory outcomes. The utilization of a computer-assisted hexapod external fixator facilitates a gradual and precise correction process, which proved to be an effective and relatively safe method.

Indexed as

External FixatorsOsteotomyTibiaAdolescentAdultBone PlatesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurgery, Computer-AssistedYoung AdultExternal fixationSupramalleolar osteotomyTibial deformity

Identifiers

PMID39161056
PMCPMC11572567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.