Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39160593›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2024

Weakly-supervised deep learning models enable HER2-low prediction from H &E stained slides.

Renan Valieris, Luan Martins, Alexandre Defelicibus, Adriana Passos Bueno, Cynthia Aparecida Bueno de Toledo Osorio, Dirce Carraro, Emmanuel Dias-Neto, Rafael A Rosales, Jose Marcio Barros de Figueiredo, Israel Tojal da Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Renan Valieris *Laboratory of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, CIPE/A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, São Paulo, 01508-010, Brazil.
Luan Martins *Laboratory of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, CIPE/A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, São Paulo, 01508-010, Brazil.
Alexandre DefelicibusLaboratory of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, CIPE/A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, São Paulo, 01508-010, Brazil.
Adriana Passos BuenoLaboratory of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, CIPE/A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, São Paulo, 01508-010, Brazil.
Cynthia Aparecida Bueno de Toledo OsorioDepartment of Pathology, CIPE/A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, São Paulo, 01508-010, Brazil.
Dirce CarraroLaboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biology, CIPE/A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, São Paulo, 01508-010, Brazil.
Emmanuel Dias-NetoLaboratory Medical Genomics, CIPE/A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, São Paulo, 01508-010, Brazil.
Rafael A RosalesDepartamento de Computação e Matemática, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14040-901, Brazil.
Jose Marcio Barros de Figueiredo *Laboratory of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, CIPE/A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, São Paulo, 01508-010, Brazil.
Israel Tojal da Silva *Laboratory of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, CIPE/A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, São Paulo, 01508-010, Brazil. itojal@accamargo.org.br.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2022/12991-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer has emerged as a new subtype of tumor, for which novel antibody-drug conjugates have shown beneficial effects. Assessment of HER2 requires several immunohistochemistry tests with an additional in situ hybridization test if a case is classified as HER2 2+. Therefore, novel cost-effective methods to speed up the HER2 assessment are highly desirable.

methodsWe used a self-supervised attention-based weakly supervised method to predict HER2-low directly from 1437 histopathological images from 1351 breast cancer patients. We built six distinct models to explore the ability of classifiers to distinguish between the HER2-negative, HER2-low, and HER2-high classes in different scenarios. The attention-based model was used to comprehend the decision-making process aimed at relevant tissue regions.

resultsOur results indicate that the effectiveness of classification models hinges on the consistency and dependability of assay-based tests for HER2, as the outcomes from these tests are utilized as the baseline truth for training our models. Through the use of explainable AI, we reveal histologic patterns associated with the HER2 subtypes.

conclusionOur findings offer a demonstration of how deep learning technologies can be applied to identify HER2 subgroup statuses, potentially enriching the toolkit available for clinical decision-making in oncology.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsDeep LearningErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesImmunohistochemistryFemaleHumansSupervised Machine LearningBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesArtificial intelligenceBreast cancerDigital pathologyHER2

Identifiers

PMID39160593
PMCPMC11331614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.