ArticleMalaria journal2024
Receipt of antimalarials among children aged 6-59 months in Nigeria from 2010 to 2021.
Article in Malaria journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Accuracy of recording and reporting of malaria rapid diagnostic tests in Nigeria.Malaria journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNigeria has the highest malaria burden globally, and anti-malarials have been commonly used to treat malaria without parasitological confirmation. In 2012, Nigeria implemented rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) to reduce the use of anti-malarials for those without malaria and to increase the use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) for malaria treatment. This study examined changes in anti-malarial receipt among children aged 6-59 months during a 12-year period of increasing RDT availability.
methodsA cross-sectional analysis was conducted using the Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey (NMIS) data from 2010 (before RDT implementation in 2012), 2015, and 2021. The analysis assessed trends in prevalence of malaria by survey RDT result, and fever and anti-malarial/ACT receipt in the 2 weeks prior to the survey. A multivariable logistic regression was used to account for the complex survey design and to examine factors associated with anti-malarial receipt, stratified by survey RDT result, a proxy for recent/current malaria infection.
resultsIn a nationally-representative, weighted sample of 22,802 children aged 6-59 months, fever prevalence remained stable over time, while confirmed malaria prevalence decreased from 51.2% in 2010 to 44.3% in 2015 and 38.5% in 2021 (trend test p < 0.0001). Anti-malarial use among these children decreased from 19% in 2010 to 10% in 2021 (trend test p < 0.0001), accompanied by an increase in ACT use (2% in 2010 to 8% in 2021; trend test p < 0.0001). Overall, among children who had experienced fever, 30.6% of survey RDT-positive and 36.1% of survey RDT-negative children had received anti-malarials. The proportion of anti-malarials obtained from the private sector increased from 61.8% in 2010 to 80.1% in 2021 for RDT-positive children; most of the anti-malarials received in 2021 were artemisinin-based combinations. Factors associated with anti-malarial receipt for both RDT-positive and RDT-negative children included geographic region, greater household wealth, higher maternal education, and older children.
conclusionFrom 2010 to 2021 in Nigeria, both malaria prevalence and anti-malarial treatments among children aged 6-59 months decreased, as RDT availability increased. Among children who had fever in the prior 2 weeks, anti-malarial receipt was similar between children with either positive or negative survey RDT results, indicative of persistent challenges in reducing inappropriate anti-malarials uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.